

tribal courts
Todd Hembree Commentary in EdWeek about the Cherokee Opioid Matter
Todd Hembree has published “Fighting the Opioid Epidemic at Its Source” in EdWeek.
Eid & Goldtooth on Navajo Juvenile Justice Law
Troy A. Eid and DeAnna Goldtooth have published “’Children Are Sacred’: Applying Navajo (Dine’) Fundamental Law to Strengthen Juvenile Justice” at 62 The University of South Dakota Law Review 728 (2017). The draft manuscript is here.
Federal Court Enjoins Cherokee Nation Tribal Court Suit against Opioid Companies
Here is the order in McKesson Corp. v. Hembree (N.D. Okla.):
An excerpt:
Oklahoma is among the states with the highest number of opioid prescriptions per one hundred people and has a high overdose death rate. Tribal communities have been tragically affected, as have other communities in Oklahoma. Numerous cities, counties and states throughout the country, including the state of Oklahoma, have filed lawsuits against various opioid manufactures, pharmaceutical distributors, and other businesses allegedly responsible for the proliferation of opioid drugs. This proceeding concerns a lawsuit by the Cherokee Nation against a number of opioid distributors and pharmacies. However, the question before the Court is not the merits of the Cherokee Nation’s lawsuit but rather the boundaries of tribal court jurisdiction. The Attorney General of the Cherokee Nation has filed suit not in state court but in the tribal district court of the Cherokee Nation. Do the tribal courts of the Cherokee Nation have jurisdiction over this particular action? The Court finds they do not.
Briefs here.
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Coeur d’Alene Tribe v. Hawks
Federal Magistrate Enters Default against Yamassee Tribal Nation Supreme Court in Claim involving JPMorgan Chase
Here are the materials in JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Khamsanvong (E.D. Cal.):
Window Rock School District v. Reeves Cert Stage Materials
Norton v. Ute Indian Tribe Cert Petition
Here:
Question presented:
In light of the clear precedent of Nevada v. Hicks, 533 U.S. 353 (2001), which holds that state law enforcement officers are not subject to suit in a tribal court for claims arising out of the performance of their duties on tribal lands, did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals err in requiring Petitioners to exhaust their remedies in the Ute Tribal Court in order to determine whether that Court has jurisdiction to hear a trespass claim arising out of Petitioners’ performance of their official duties that the Ute Indian Tribe brought against them in the Ute Tribal Court?
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE:
NYTs Profile on Cherokee Suit against Opioid Manufacturers and Distributors
Federal Court Dismisses Foreclosure Action against Tulalip Tribes & Tribal Member
Here are the materials in Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. Fryberg (W.D. Wash.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.