Here is the opinion in Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. Bernhardt.
Briefs here.
Here is the opinion in Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. Bernhardt.
Briefs here.
Here:
Lower court materials here.
From the Administration for Children and Families here.
The rule is delayed until 2020 and the Administration is going to “streamline” the data elements. And then it might just be delayed again based on the “streamlining”:
The Children’s Bureau published in the Federal Register on August 21, 2018 a final rule to delay implementation of the December 2016 AFCARS final rule until October 1, 2020 (83 FR 42225). However, since we plan to revise the AFCARS data points, we will revisit this implementation date to provide a timeframe to allow title IV-E agencies time to comply with the revised AFCARS data points.
Here are the materials in Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. Zinke (D.N.M.):
Here are the materials and documents in the matter of Butte County, CA v. Chadhouri et al, 08-cv-00519 (D.C. July 15, 2016):
Doc. 125 – United States’ Reply in Support of its Cross Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 128 – Memorandum-Decision and Order
Link to previous coverage here.
Here is the opinion in this NEPA claim (D. Colo.) — Dine Citizens against Ruining Our Environment v Klein
An excerpt:
This action concerns alleged violations of the National Environmental Protection Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., and the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., by the Department of Interior’s Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (“OSM”) in connection with OSM’s permitting of mining and related operations at the Navajo Mine. It is before me on the motion to dismiss or to transfer venue filed by OSM and Al Klein, its Western Regional Director, (collectively “Federal Defendants”) and separate motions to dismiss filed by intervenors Arizona Public Service Company (“APS”) and BHP Navajo Coal Company (“BHP”). Having carefully considered the motions, related briefing, and all applicable legal authorities, and being fully advised in the premises, I deny the motions in part and grant them in part.
Here are the materials in this case involving the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians: