District of Nevada – Page 9

Here are current materials in Crosby Lodge v. NIGC (D. Nev.), a challenge to NIGC authority to require that 60 percent of on-reservation gaming revenues of non-Indian gaming entities go to tribes (25 CFR 522.10(c)):

Crosby Lodge Motion for Summary Judgment

NIGC Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

Earlier materials here.

District Court Finds “Colorable” Tribal Court Jurisdiction in FMLA Claim

September 11, 2009Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in Paddy v. Mulkey (D. Nev.):

DCT Order to Show Cause

Plaintiff Brief Opposing Tribal Court Jurisdiction

Defendants Brief Favoring Tribal Court Jurisdiction

Plaintiff Reply Brief

Paddy v. Mulkey DCT Order

Boney v. Valline — Suit re: Police Liability under Self-Determination Act & FTCA

February 12, 2009February 12, 2009Matthew L.M. Fletcher3 Comments

Here is the opinion in this case — boney-v-valline-dct-order — where the District of Nevada held that a tribal officer who employed deadly force was enforcing tribal law, and so could not be liable under the FTCA or the Self-Determination Act.

Here are the materials:

boney-first-amended-complaint

valline-motion-for-summary-judgment

boney-opposition-to-motion

valline-reply-brief

Cortez Hills Gold Project Materials

January 27, 2009Matthew L.M. Fletcher1 Comment

The District of Nevada denied the motion for an injunction (news article here, via Indianz). The motion by the South Fork Band is here — south-fork-motion-for-tro

Crosby Lodge v. NIGC — Facial Challenge to 25 CFR 522.10(c) Rejected

December 6, 2008Matthew L.M. Fletcher2 Comments

Crosby Lodge is licensed by Paiute Lake Indian tribe to conduct Class III gaming. Under the regulation, they owe at least 60 percent of revenues to the tribe. The company challenged the reg, and lost.

nigc-motion-for-summary-judgment

crosby-lodge-opposition

nigc-reply-brief

crosby-lodge-v-nigc-dct-opinion