Here is the complaint in State of New Mexico v. Jewell (D. N.M.):
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D. N.M.) referenced in the complaint:
11 Pueblo of Pojoaque Motion for Default Judgment
15 New Mexico Response to Motion for Default Judgment
18 Pueblo of Pojoaque Response
21 DCT Order Setting Aside Default Judgment
We posted the complaint in that case here.
Here:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials so far in Pueblo of Jemez v. United States:
Lower court materials here.
The District of New Mexico has posted vacancy announcements for Assistant United States Attorneys on the DOJ Internet and DOJ Intranet web sites. These positions are located in the Albuquerque and/or the Las Cruces, NM Office. If you know of anyone who might be interested in applying, please make sure to direct them to the appropriate link below and advise them to review the complete announcement for full information.
http://www.justice.gov/careers/legal/jobs/14-ausa-nm-1.htm (CRIMINAL)
http://www.justice.gov/careers/legal/jobs/14-ausa-nm-2.htm (CIVIL)
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Jemez v. United States (D. N.M.):
Jemez v USA Memorandum Opinion and Order
An excerpt:
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. §2409A, seeking a judgment that it has the exclusive right to use, occupy, and possess the lands of the Valles Caldera National Preserve pursuant to its continuing aboriginal title to such lands. (Doc. 1). Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. (Doc. 14). Plaintiff opposes the motion and requests oral argument. (Doc. 18). The Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary as the Indian Claims Commission Act (ICCA), formerly codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 70 to 70n-2, divests this Court of jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claim.
Briefs are here.
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Nash (D. N.M.):
52 — Pueblo Motion for Summary J
63 — Pueblo Reply to Judge Nash
An excerpt:
Specifically, the Court hereby enters a declaration that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2701, et seq. (“IGRA”) does not authorize an allocation of jurisdiction from tribal court to state court over a personal injury claim arising from the allegedly negligent serving of alcohol on Indian land, and further that the New Mexico State District Court does not have jurisdiction in the case of Gina Mendoza, Michael Hart and Dominic Montoya v. Tamaya Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Santa Ana Star Casino, CIV 2007-005711 (“underlying state court litigation”).
Prior federal court order and materials here.
Here are the materials in Hanover Insurance Co. v. Urban Outfitters (E.D. Pa.):
Here are the materials in Shiprock Associated Schools Inc. v. United States (D. N.M.):
DCT Order Denying Federal Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt:
Defendants’ disallowance of the School’s administrative cost expenditures was based on an unreasonable and improper interpretation of the TCSA. Count I of the Complaint, which seeks relief from Defendants’ disallowance determination on the basis that it reflects an invalid interpretation of the TCSA, thus states a claim upon which relief can be granted. The remaining Counts of the Complaint, all of which are alleged in the alternative and necessarily depend upon a determination that Defendants’ interpretation of the TCSA was valid, are rendered moot by this Court’s decision.
Here are the materials in Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters (D. N.M.):
NN v. UOs Order Denying Motion to Dismiss
Previous materials on a denied motion to transfer venue are here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.