Here are the briefs:
Dupris Reply to Officers Brief
Lower court materials are here.
Here are the materials in Runs After v. United States (D. S.D.):
Here are the materials in Harvey v. United States:
Here are the materials in Challinor v. United States (E.D. Wash.), where the court concludes:
In summary, because the Estate’s FTCA negligence claims colorably fall within FECA’s scope, the Court must dismiss this lawsuit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Moe, 326 F.3d at 1068 (requiring dismissal of a claim that is “colorably within” FECA’s scope). Although the United States may face liability under the FTCA if an injury occurs to a non-Job-Corps participant at YFP because that individual may not be a federal employee, the Court recognizes this question is not before it at this time. The Court is hopeful that the BIA and YFP take the appropriate necessary steps to ensure that all workers, especially those young Job Corps students with so much life ahead, are not subjected to such serious safety violations. See Marly’s Bear Med. v. United States, 241 F.3d 1208, 1216-17 (9th Cir. 2000) (finding that fatal injuries to anon-federal employee during a logging operation conducted pursuant to a BIA contract were recoverable under the FTCA because the BIA’s responsibility to ensure that safety precautions were implemented was not a discretionary function). The Court is also hopeful that Congress will soon address the shameful inadequacy of FECA’s $10,000.00 death gratuity payment. While the law required this decision, the Court sympathizes with Mr. Challinor’s parents for the loss of their son.
Here are the federal government’s pleadings in that case (and all the rest of the materials moved here as well):
Proposed United States’ Amicus Brief
Brief of Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Pltf.’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment
Order Granting Rule 60 Relief (main opinion)
An excerpt:
In this case, the GRIC officers were acting in the course and scope of their employment, but off the geographical boundaries of Indian Country. The Federal Tort Claim Act does not apply. Their activities instead fall within the intent of 25 U.S.C. § 450f(c). To the amount of GRIC liability coverage for the Defendants’ law enforcement activities off Indian Country not covered by FTCA, the GRIC has waived its Sovereign Immunity to suit in Arizona. The Court finds persuasive the U.S.A.’s Amicus Brief legal analysis. The Tribe has waived its Sovereign Immunity for the activities of the Defendant Officers in this case.
Here are the materials in Dupris v. McDonald (D. Ariz.):
DCT Order Dismissing Dupris Complaint
BIA Motion to Dismiss Complaint
US Motion to Dismiss Complaint
Here:
An excerpt from the press release:
On December 7, 2011, Edwin Chappabitty, Jr., MD, Lawton, Oklahoma, filed a Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit for monetary damages in the United States Court for the Western District of Oklahoma alleging that officials of the United States Department of Health and Human, Indian Health Service, negligently failed to follow federal laws and regulations governing the conduct of investigations into alleged professional misconduct by physicians employed by the Indian Health Service. Dr. Chappabitty never expected to be accused of leveling racist statements to his patients on May 1, 2008 just four months from the end of his thirty year career in the federal service.
Chappabitty, Comanche/Ft. Sill Apache, retired from the IHS in August 2008 as a naval captain, having come to the service as an officer in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, a uniformed, non-military government agency under the purview of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Here is the opinion and materials in Buxton v. United States (D. S.D.):
Here are the materials in Robinson v. United States (E.D. Cal.):
US Motion to Dismiss Robinson Complaint
US Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
This case has already been dismissed before, see here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.