Here are the materials in Silva v. Farrish (E.D. N.Y.):
90 Objection to Magistrate Report
Prior briefs here.
Here are the materials in Silva v. Farrish (E.D. N.Y.):
90 Objection to Magistrate Report
Prior briefs here.
Here are the updated materials in Silva v. Farrish (E.D. N.Y.):
83-6 Suffolk County Motion for Summary Judgment
84-8 New York Motion for Summary Judgment
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Silva v. Farrish (E.D. N.Y.):
54-3 county defendants motion to dismiss
56-3 state defendants motion to dismiss
Prior post here.
UPDATE:
Here (scroll down to the second audio player).
Here is Quileute & Quinault’s response, addressing issues such as whether the Stevens treaties must be read together, the meaning of “fish” and whether U&As are species-specific, the proper use of the canons of construction, and what we know of the treaty negotiations at issue here.
Previous coverage here.
Decision is here: ocean case decision. Bottom line: Quileute has fishing rights 40 miles offshore, and Quinault has rights 30 miles offshore.
Previous coverage is here.
HUGE.
Here is the order (briefs shortly):
752 – Memorandum and Order Granting Perm. Injunction
UPDATE: Perm Injunction
Judge Martinez’s 2007 order (and materials) is here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.