Here are the materials so far in Aguilar v. Rodriguez (D.N.M.):
ICRA habeas
Tenth Circuit Rejects ICRA Claims against Ute Tribe
Federal Magistrate Recommends Granting ICRA Habeas Petition of Kewa Pueblo Prisoner [Van Pelt III]
Here are the materials in Van Pelt III v. Geisen (D.N.M.):
Federal Magistrate Recommends Granting ICRA Habeas Petition of Kewa Pueblo Prisoner [Tortalita]
Here are the materials in Tortalita v. Geisen (D.N.M.):
Federal Magistrate Recommends Granting ICRA Habeas Petition of Kewa Pueblo Prisoner [Garcia]
Here are the materials in Garcia v. Geisen (D.N.M.):
Federal Court Dismisses ICRA Suit re: Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians Disenrollments
Here are the materials in John v. Garcia (N.D. Cal.):
Federal Court Dismisses Habeas Petition by Kickapoo Member for Failure to Exhaust Tribal Remedies
Here are the materials in Darnell v. Merchant (D. Kan.):
An excerpt:
Petitioner Bobbie Darnell, a member of the Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas (the “Tribe”), filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1303 seeking relief from her tribal court convictions and sentence. Petitioner requests that the Court issue a writ of habeas corpus commanding her immediate release from jail in Brown County, Kansas, overturning her convictions in Kickapoo criminal cases numbers CRM016-11 and CRM016-23, and staying all further tribal court action against her (Doc. 1). In addition, Petitioner has filed a motion for release on her own recognizance (Doc. 25). As explained below, the Court denies the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus because Petitioner has not exhausted her tribal remedies. The Court further denies Petitioner’s motion for release on her own recognizance as moot.
Federal Court Finds Tribal Court Exhaustion Futile, Grants ICRA Habeas Petition
Here are the materials in Toya v. Toledo (D.N.M.):
19 DCT Order Adopting Magistrate Report
Prior post here.
Tavares v. Whitehouse Cert Petition (United Auburn Indian Community Banishment)
Here:
Question presented:
This case presents a question that divides the circuits: Should the “detention” requirement for habeas review under the ICRA be construed “more narrowly than” the “custody” showing required under other federal habeas statutes?
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE (10/27/17): Amicus Brief
Federal Court Orders Indian Prisoner to Add Charging Tribe to Suit in ICRA Habeas Action
Here is the order in Talk v. Southern Ute Detention Center (D.N.M.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.