Here are the materials so far in Jones v. Wildcat (E.D. Pa.):
2019.06.07-docket-1-complaint-with-exhibits.pdf
2019.08.30-docket-9-wildcat-mtd.pdf
Here are the materials so far in Jones v. Wildcat (E.D. Pa.):
2019.06.07-docket-1-complaint-with-exhibits.pdf
2019.08.30-docket-9-wildcat-mtd.pdf
Here are the materials in Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Walker (W.D. Wis.):
2018.11.30 – Docket 01 – Complaint
2018.11.30 – Docket 1-1 – Civil Cover Sheet
2018.11.30 – Docket 1-2 – Exhibit Index
2018.11.30 – Docket 1-3 – Exhibit A – Treaty with Chippewa
2018.11.30 – Docket 1-4 – Exhibit B – Sample Red Cliff Patent
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed a termination of parental rights decision under ICWA and WICWA using Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl (finding abandonment/lack of continued custody by non-Indian father).
Here are the materials in Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. State of Wisconsin (W.D. Wis.):
This case is on remand from the CA7, materials here.
News coverage here.
The petition is here.
Here is the petition in Wisconsin v. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians:
Wisconsin Petition for Writ of Certiorari
Question presented:
A moving party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) must show a significant change in factual conditions or law that renders continued enforcement of a judgment detrimental to the public interest. The proceeding is not a relitigation of the underlying judgment. Here, the Seventh Circuit shifted the burden to the non-moving party (Wisconsin) to justify an underlying judgment that night hunting of deer was fundamentally unsafe. Does Rule 60(b)(5) permit shifting the burden to the non-moving party to justify the original judgment?
Seventh Circuit materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.