Here is the petition in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland:
Panel stage materials here.

Here is the petition in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland:
Panel stage materials here.

Here are the updated materials in Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. Draganchuk (W.D. Mich.):
Prior post here.
Law360 reports the state court held the tribe in contempt for failure to respond to discovery requests. Everyone’s got a litigation strategy, I guess. You can watch the hearing below.

Here are the materials so far in Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. Draganchuk (W.D. Mich.):
1-6 State Court Motion for Contempt
1-7 State Court Hearing Transcript on Motion to Dismiss
1-8 State Court Motion to Compel
1-9 State Court Denying Summary Disposition for Kewadin
1-10 State Court Order Denying Motion to Dismiss by Kewadin
1-11 State Court Order re Discovery Motion
1-12 State Court Order to Show Cause
1-13 State Court Motion to Dismiss
1-14 State Court Response to Discovery Motion

Prior federal court suit here.
Last Friday’s D.C. Circuit opinion explains one of the many reasons the Lansing casino project died.
Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland.
Briefs here.
For commentary on legal analysis by reading the dictionary, see Joseph Kimball’s work on the Michigan Supreme Court’s use of dictionaries.

Here are the materials in JLLJ Development LLC v. Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority (W.D. Mich.):
32 DCT Order re Subject Matter Jurisdiction
34 JLLJ Brief re Subject Matter Jurisdiction
35 Kewadin Casinos Brief re Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Prior post with earlier briefs here.
Here are the briefs (so far) in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt:
Nottawaseppi Huron Band Potawatomi + Saginaw Chippewa Brief
Lower court materials here.
Here is the complaint in JLLJ Development LLC v. Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority (W.D. Mich.):
Update:
Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Case tag here.
Here are the pleadings in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Case tag here.
Here are the materials so far in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
1-1 Solicitor Opinion on Bay Mills
1-6 July 2017 Interior Decision
16-1 Saginaw Chippewa Motion to Intervene
18-1 Detroit Casinos Motion to Intervene
20 Nottawaseppi Huron Band Motion to Intervene
28 Sault Tribe Opposition to Intervention Motions
29 Federal Opposition to Detroit Casinos Motion to Intervene
31 Saginaw Chippewa Reply in Support of 16
32 Detroit Casinos Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene
33 NHBPI Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene
Prior posts on the Lansing/Wayne County casino proposals are here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.