Here is the order in People v. Caswell.
Lower court materials here.

Application materials:
Here is the opinion in Kewadin Casinos Gaming v. Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP:
Here are the applications for leave to appeal in In re Application of Enbridge Energy to Replace & Relocate Line 5:
Application for Leave to Appeal
Lower court materials here.

Here is the opinion in In re Application of Enbridge Energy to Replace and Relocate Line 5 [Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. Michigan Public Service Commission].

Here is the majority opinion in In re Peters/Brinton/Mathews and in In re Brinton (note the complete absence of any mention of ICWA or MIFPA)
And here is Judge Maldonado’s dissent, which is based entirely on ICWA/MIFPA and is 🔥:

Here.

There has been a small spate of Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act cases this year involving family law cases and tribal courts. In most states, tribes are considered “states” for the purposes of determining a child’s “home state” jurisdiction. These are generally (but not always) non-ICWA cases like parental custody and child support. These kind of cases seem rare to practitioners, but nationally there’s a fair number of them (and will continue to be the kind of reasoning tribal and state judges will need to engage in to as more and more cases arise in this subject area).
McGrathBressette (Michigan, child custody v. child protection)
MontanaLDC (Montana, child custody)
NevadaBlount (Nevada, third party custody)
(And yes, I have a pile of ICWA cases to share with you that have built up in the last month or so.)
You must be logged in to post a comment.