Here are the briefs in Eagleman v. Rocky Boys Chippewa Cree Tribal Business Committee:
chippewa-cree-housing-authority-answer-brief
Lower court materials here.
Oral argument video here.
Here are the briefs in Eagleman v. Rocky Boys Chippewa Cree Tribal Business Committee:
chippewa-cree-housing-authority-answer-brief
Lower court materials here.
Oral argument video here.
Here is the unpublished order in Alto v. Jewell.
Briefs here.
Download (PDF): Respondent’s Petition for Rehearing en Banc
Here is the unpublished opinion in United States v. PMB, Juvenile Male.
Oral argument video here.
Here:
Lower court order here.
Here is the opinion in Alvarez v. Lopez.
An excerpt:
We consider whether an Indian tribe violated a criminal defendant’s rights by failing to inform him that he could receive a jury trial only by requesting one.
The answer was yes. One judge dissented.
The same panel had held in 2014 that the petitioner had failed to exhaust tribal remedies. Those materials here.
The panel issued this opinion on rehearing. Here are the rehearing stage materials:
Here is the opinion in Akina v. State of Hawai’i.
An excerpt:
These appeals concern recent efforts by a group of Native Hawaiians to establish their own government. The plaintiffs are Hawaii residents who challenge that process. They appeal the district court’s order denying their request for a preliminary injunction to stop activities related to the drafting and ratification of self-governance documents. Separately, another group of Hawaii residents appeals the district court’s denial of their motion to intervene in the plaintiffs’ lawsuit. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal of the preliminary injunction order as moot, and we affirm the district court’s denial of the motion to intervene.
Briefs here.
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington (subproceeding 09-01):
Here are the materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Chaudhuri (E.D. Cal.):
127-1 Federal Motion to Dismiss
133-1 JAC Motion for Summary J
This case is on remand from the Ninth Circuit; those materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.