Here is the motion in Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. Salazar (N.D. Cal.):
Hopland Band Motion for Summary J
The complaint is here.
Here is the motion in Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. Salazar (N.D. Cal.):
Hopland Band Motion for Summary J
The complaint is here.
Here is the order in Belinda K. v. County of Alameda (N.D. Cal.):
DCT Order Dismissing Belinda K’s Complaint
Here is the first order.
Here are the briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Allen v. United States (N.D. Cal.):
Here is the motion in Kumeyayy Cultural Repatriation Committee v. University of California (S.D. Cal.):
Materials in a related case, White v. University of California, are here.
Here are the materials, available in a federal court removal petition by the defendants:
Here are the materials in Admiral Insurance Co. v. Blue Lake Tribal Court (N.D. Cal.):
Admiral Renewed Motion for TRO
Blue Lake Tribal Court Opposition
DCT Order Denying Admiral Renewed TRO Motion
Materials on Admiral’s prior attempt to secure a TRO are here.
Here are the materials in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (N.D. Cal.):
From the order:
Admiral seeks a TRO enjoining the Defendants from exercising tribal court jurisdiction over Admiral and conducting any further proceedings against Admiral. Proposed Order, ECF No. 10-4. Admiral argues that a TRO “is needed in order to preserve the status quo so that the jurisdictional issues can be determined first. If this request is not granted, Admiral is forced to submit to the jurisdiction of the Tribal Court without due process or be subject to sanctions for failing to file a substantive motion on whether Admiral owes a duty to defend and indemnify WRI and have a motion for summary judgment be pending against it to which it cannot oppose, since an opposition would be viewed as subjection to the Tribal Court’s jurisdiction.” TRO Appl. 7
You must be logged in to post a comment.