The Cherokee Nation has voluntarily dismissed their claims against the feds in Cherokee Nation v. Nash:
Cherokee nation vs nash order 8 21 2012 feds
The feds have an outstanding counterclaim against the Nation and so they remain parties.
In the D.C. Circuit appeal, Vann v. Interior, here is Vann’s reply brief:
2012-08-30 Reply Brief of Appellants Marilyn Vann et al
Prior briefs are here.
Here is the majority:
And the dissent:
And links to all the briefs:
85661-3 – Automotive United Trades Organization v. State of Washington et al.
Hearing Date – 01/12/2012
Here are the additional materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
Hobia Motion for Reconsideration
Oklahoma Opposition to Reconsideration Motion
Hobia Reply in Reconsideration Motion
DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
DCT Order Granting Modification of Injunction
Our prior post on this case is here.
Here are those briefs:
Cherokee Nation Brief [defending the Rule 19 dismissal]
Interior Brief [arguing against Rule 19 dismissal]
The opening brief is here.
.
Here are the materials in Klamath Claims Committee v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Here are the materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
[105] Opinion Order DenyingMTDs. Filed. 04-26-12 (W1686451)
Town Corporation Motion to Dismiss
The complaint and the still pending motion for injunction from the State are here.
Here:
Here is the opinion in Salt River Project v. Lee.
Lower court materials here.
More materials later.
Update — here are the briefs:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.