Here:
Question presented:
Whether the Tenth Circuit panel violated the current jurisprudence of this Court and the Congressional policy underlying IGRA by precluding the Nation from exercising its sovereign authority to permit a patron’s tort claim against the Nation and its gaming facility to be brought in state court without express congressional permission.
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE (3/14/19):
Here is the opinion in Davilla v. Enable Midstream Partners.
Briefs:
Here are the materials:
Unopposed Motion for Atty Fees
Order Denying En Banc Petition
Other posts here.
Here is the opinion. An excerpt:
Plaintiff Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission, LLC, appeals the district court’s dismissal of its case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to join an indispensable party. Enable also challenges the amount of attorney fees the court awarded to the landowner defendants. Because our decision in Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Barboan, 857 F.3d 1101 (10th Cir. 2017), is dispositive of the subject matter jurisdiction issue, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing the action. We likewise affirm the attorney fees award as consistent with Oklahoma law.
Briefs and lower court materials here.
Here:
Lower court materials here.
Here is the opinion in United States v. Dixon.
Here is the opinion in State of New Mexico v. Aamodt.
Briefs:
Answering Brief for the United States of America
Appellant’s Consolidated Reply Brief to Appellees’ and Appellees in Intervention’s Briefs
Appellant’s Supplemental Brief Pursuant to the Court’s April 5, 2018 Order
Joint Answer Brief of Defendants-Appellees Santa Fe County and City of Santa Fe
Response Brief of Appellee the Rio De Tesuque Association, Inc.
Here is the opinion in Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. United States.
Briefs here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.