No Casino in Plymouth v. NIGC Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

  1. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it dismissed plaintiffs’ challenge to DOI’s approval of a trust transfer for the Ione Band which was not a recognized tribe in 1934 as required by the IRA?
  2. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it dismissed plaintiffs’ challenge to NIGC’s authority to approve a gaming ordinance for the Ione Band which has no Indian lands as defined by IGRA?
  3. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it dismissed plaintiffs’ claim that federal acknowledgement as a tribe under 25 CFR Part 83 is a prerequisite for the Ione Band to receive IRA and IGRA benefits?

Lower court materials here.

Ninth Circuit Affirms No Casino in Plymouth v. NIGC [Ione Band]

Here is the unpublished opinion.

Briefs:

Lower court materials here.

California Federal Court Rejects Challenge to Ione Band Miwok Gaming Ordinance

Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. National Indian Gaming Commission (E.D. Cal.):

National Indian Gaming Commission Moves to Dismiss Chukchansi Gaming Ordinance Suit

Here is the motion in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Stevens (D. D.C.):

NIGC Motion to Dismiss Chukchansi Complaint

Complaint is here.

Chukchansi v. NIGC Complaint

Here is the complaint in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Stevens (D. D.C.):

Chukchansi Complaint

An excerpt:

This is a civil action against the United States National Indian Gaming Commission and its officials (collectively, the “Chairwoman,” the “Commission,” the “NIGC,” or “Defendants”) under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 551, et seq. and 701, et seq., seeking mandamus and related relief compelling the Commission to comply with its statutory duty to approve and publish gaming ordinance amendments submitted by the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians (“Tribe”).

D.C. Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Challenge to NIGC Approval of Lytton Rancheria Gaming Ordinance

Here is the per curiam order in Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Salazar:

DC Circuit Order

And the briefs (opening brief is here):

Interior Appellee Brief

Lytton Rancheria Appellee Brief

Neighbors Reply

Opening Brief in D.C. Circuit Appeal of Dismissal of Challenge to Lytton Band Gaming Ordinance

Here is the opening brief in Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Salazar:

Neighbors Opening Brief

Seneca Allowed to File Amicus in Challenge to Seneca Gaming Laws

Here is the district court order in Warren v. United States (W.D. N.Y.) — DCT Order re Seneca Amicus Motion

Seneca Motion for Leave & Amicus Brief