Here: Sandia Cert Opp.
Petition and other materials here.
Here: Sandia Cert Opp.
Petition and other materials here.
Here are the materials in Martin v. Little River Band in Manistee County Circuit Court (apparently, there is a hearing Monday on the motion to dismiss):
Here is the decision in Joseph Martin v. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians from the Little River Band Tribal Court (Judge Bill Brott, sitting pro tem): Martin v. LRB.
In Reeves v. LaSalle Bank (Md. App.), Reeves is trying to avoid the loss of land to the bank on grounds that she deeded the land to the Delaware Nation. This is the second time the case has reached the Maryland appellate courts:
Yesterday, July 2, according to Michael McBride. Here is the federal injunction at issue:
Judgment Confirming Arbitration Award in Favor of ESTOO 07-01.
Here are the materials in Copeland v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians dba Silverstar Casino (S.D. Miss.):
DCT Order Dismissing Copeland Complaint
Here is the opinion: Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. State of Oklahoma.
The Tribe’s motion for summary J and its complaint were posted earlier today here.
Here is the order in Choctaw Nation and Chickasaw Nation v. State of Oklahoma (W.D. Okla.): choctawchickasaworder.
If you’ll recall, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in a series of cases held that state courts were “courts of competent jurisdiction” to take jurisdiction over tort claims brought under a Class III gaming compact approved by Oklahoma voters and, later, several Oklahoma tribes.
Oklahoma tribes (with the State consenting) then invoked the arbitration provision of the compacts, arguing the Supreme Court had violated the terms of the compact. They were successful.
This federal suit followed. Very interesting case.
Here is the opinion in Madewell v. Harrah’s (W.D. N.C.): DCT Order Dismissing Slip and Fall Claim
Available here, on Mr. Hoffman’s website. here:
UPDATE: Incidentally, Hoffman’s attorney apparently is the same Paul Livingston who challenged the Santa Fe Indian Market all those years ago in Livingston v. Ewing, known to (according to an anonymous source) “rant[] in local right wingnut rags about abolishing Indian law.”
Lower court materials here. Local TV coverage here, via Pechanga.
Questions presented:
1. Whether the doctrine of tribal immunity properly bars claims that an Indian Casino cheated a non-Indian gambler by refusing to pay a slot machine jackpot?
2. Whether the “property damage” under the waiver of immunity in Section 8 of the Tribal Gaming Compact applies only to physical damage to property?
As you might suspect, I give this petition very little chance. I would doubt any response is necessary. There’s no split in authority and the case isn’t important on a national level. As for question 1, I am always suspicious of claims that Indian casinos have cheated gamblers because casinos LOVE IT when there’s a jackpot — it means that everyone and their brother is going to show up at that casino to replicate the magic. And question 2 is just patently frivolous.
You must be logged in to post a comment.