W.D. of New York Dismisses Seneca County’s Counterclaims in Tax Foreclosure Suit

Download briefs and order in the matter of Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Seneca County, New York, 11-cv-06004 (May 2, 2017):

Links: Previous posts and further documents

Federal Magistrate Recommends Dismissal of CCTA and PACT Act Claims against Six Nations Grand River Enterprises

Here are the materials in State Of New York v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations LTD (W.D. N.Y.):

79-3 Motion to Dismiss

81-1 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Stay of Discovery

84 NY Opposition

88 Reply in Support of 79

89 Reply in Support of 81

92 DCT Order Granting Motion to Stay

97 Magistrate R&R Recommending Dismissal

Second Circuit Rules in Favor of Seneca Nation in Gaming Dispute

Here is the opinion in Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Chaudhuri:

CACGEC Opinion

The court’s syllabus:

The plaintiffs, organizations and individuals who oppose the operation of a casino on land owned by the Seneca Nation of Indians in Buffalo, New York, filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York against the National Indian Gaming Commission, its Chairman, the Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior, arguing that the National Indian Gaming Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously and abused its discretion in approving an ordinance that permitted the Seneca Nation to operate a class III gaming facility in Buffalo. The district court (Skretny, J.) dismissed the action, and the plaintiffs appealed. We hold that the Seneca Nation’s lands in Buffalo are gaming‐eligible under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721, as “Indian lands” under the Seneca Nation’s jurisdiction and that IGRA Section 20’s prohibition of gaming on trust lands acquired after IGRA’s enactment, 25 U.S.C. § 2719(a), does not apply. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

Briefs here.

Lower court materials here.

Tribal and Federal Court Complaints in Dispute between Seneca Nation and National Fuel Gas Co.

Here is the complaint in National Fuel Gas Co. v. Seneca Nation of Indians (W.D. N.Y.), and tribal court complaints attached as exhibits:

1 Complaint

1-5 SNI v National Fuel Gas Co Complaint

1-6 SNI v. National Fuel Gas Co Complaint II

 

Federal Forfeiture Action over $400,000 of NY Indian Tobacco Retailer

Here is the complaint in United States v. $400,000 (W.D. N.Y.):

1 Complaint for Forfeiture

Excerpts:

During the investigation, it was determined that the parties involved in the shipping of the contraband cigarettes in interstate commerce also filed false information to the appropriate taxation authorities as required under the Jenkins Act, Title 15, United States Code, Sections 375-378. All cigarette sales made by a stamping agent are required by New York State law to be recorded on a form known as Form CG which had to be sent on a monthly basis to the NYSDT in Albany, New York, with a certificate that the information contained therein was true and correct.

And:

During the time period of September 24, 2012 – January 14, 2013, AARON PIERCE through his corporation, AJ’s Wholesale LLC (“hereafter “AJ’s”) sold 403,413 cartons of cigarettes in a manner designed to make it look on paper as though the untaxed cigarettes were legitimately obtained through Ho-Chunk, Inc. (“HCID”) a tribal cigarette and tobacco distributor, a corporation operated by the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, as well as other Native American cigarette and tobacco suppliers.

Finally:

Ho-Chunk, Inc. is the parent company of HCI Logistics (HCIL) which is a commercial transportation company that HCID would use to transport product from the HCID warehouse in Winnebago, Nebraska. Neither HCID nor HCIL are licensed tobacco wholesalers or state stamping agents in Nebraska or New York State.

Second Circuit Briefs in Citizens against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Hogen (FINAL)

Here:

Final CACGEC Principal Brief

Final Federal Brief

Final Seneca Amicus Brief

Final CACGEC Reply Brief

Final Federal Reply Brief

Lower court materials here.

Second Circuit Affirms Cayuga Immunity from Seneca County Tax Foreclosure Relying on Bay Mills Decision

Here are the materials in Cayuga Indian Nation v. Seneca County:

Seneca County Opening Brief

Cayuga Indian Nation Brief

Seneca County Reply

New York AG Brief

US DOJ Brief

CA2 Opinion

The syllabus:

Appeal from a district court order preliminarily enjoining Seneca County from foreclosing upon certain parcels of the Cayuga Indian Nation of New York’s real property to satisfy unpaid ad valorem property taxes. We conclude, in light of recent Supreme Court guidance, that tribal sovereign immunity from suit bars the County’s proceedings against the Nation and therefore AFFIRM the order of the district court.

Lower court materials are here.

Pretrial Motions in US v. Mitchell — Prosecution of Former Seneca Official for Fraud

Here are the materials in United States v. Mitchell (W.D. N.Y.):

53 Mitchell Omnibus Motion

74 MJ R&R Denying Omnibus Motion

106 US Brief — Suppress

113 Mitchell Reply — Suppress

116 US Response to Motion to Dismiss — Immunity

119 MJ R&R — Immunity

120 MJ R&R on Suppression

123 Mitchell Objections to 119

126 US Response to 123

137 US Response to Motion to Dismiss — Jurisdiction

138 Mitchell Brief on Major Crimes Act

140 DCT Order Denying Motion to Dismiss

Prior federal case challenging his banishment is here.

Second Circuit Briefs in Challenge to Seneca’s Buffalo Casino

UPDATE — these briefs have been superceded with final form briefs (whatever that means) available here.

Here are the materials in Citizens against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Hogen:

CACGEC Opening Brief

Federal Appellee Brief

Seneca Amicus Brief

CACGEC Reply Brief

Lower court materials here.

Federal Court Dismisses Challenges to Seneca’s Buffalo Gaming Operations — UPDATED with Briefs

Here is the opinion in Citizens against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Stevens (W.D. N.Y.):

Decision and Order May 10 2013

More details later.

Briefs:

CACGEC Motion for Summary J

Seneca Nation Opposition

United States Opposition

CACGEC Reply