New Complaint against Feds from Tribal Attorney over Attorney Fees

Here is the complaint in Corrales v. Newland (S.D. Cal.):

Materials in the other suit mentioned in the complaint are here. And yet another suit by the same plaintiff against the State of California is here.

Eleventh Circuit Reverses Anti-Tribal Lending Decision

Here are the materials in Dunn v. Global Trust Management LLC:

Lower court materials here.

Wonder what Uncle Brownie thinks. . . .

This Saturday — American Indian Boarding Schools — the Michigan Anishinaabe Experience @ UM STAMPS Gallery

Here:

American Indian boarding schools hit the Great Lakes Anishinaabeg very hard. This panel brings together survivors willing to share their experiences, helping us to never forget.

Facilitated by Matthew Fletcher, Harry Burns Hutchins Collegiate Professor of Law, University of Michigan; and Wenona Singel, Director of the Indigenous Law & Policy Center, Michigan State University.

When

Saturday, October 5, 2024
2:00 – 4:00 pm

Where

In-person Event

Stamps Gallery
201 South Division Street
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
Map/Directions
Hours/Access

Details

Lecture / Discussion
Open to the public
Free of charge

Registration Recommended

San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Arizona Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

(1) Did the Arizona Supreme Court err by determining that 40 C.F.R § 122.29(b)’s new source analysis is satisfied by merely finding a “material connection” between a newly constructed source of polluted discharge and an existing source rather than considering whether the new source operationally depends on the existing source? (2) Did the Arizona Supreme Court err by determining that new source performance standards for copper mines in 40 C.F.R. § 440.104 do not “independently apply” to Resolution’s new mine?

D.C. Federal Court Denies Injunction in California Miwok Case

Here are materials in California Valley Miwok Tribe v. Haaland (D.D.C.):

11-1 Motion to Dismiss

13 Opposition to MTD

15 Reply ISO MTD

18-1 Motion for PI

20 Opposition to Motion for PI

24 DCT Order Denying PI

Oklahoma Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Fort Sill Apache Gaming

Here are the materials in Comanche Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (W.D. Okla.), formerly Kiowa Tribe v. Dept. of the Interior:

51 Amended Complaint

53 Comanche Motion for PI

59 Fort Sill Motion to Dismiss

60 Fort Sill Opposition to 53

63 Federal Motion to Dismiss

64 Federal Opposition to 53

66 Comanche Reply ISO 53

80 Comanche Response to 59

81 Comanche Response to 63

91 Fort Sill Reply ISO 59 — Comanche

102 Kiowa Opposition to 59

103 Kiowa Response to 63

107 Fort Reply ISO 59 — Kiowa

108 Federal Reply ISO 63

123 Fort Sill Supplemental MTD

124 Federal Supplemental MTD

126 Comanche Opposition to 123

129 Fort Sill Reply ISO 123

130 Comanche Opposition to 124

131 Federal Reply ISO 124

139 DCT Order on Motion to Dismiss

Original complaint here.

Minnesota COA Holds a Subpoena is a “Suit” for Tribal Immunity Purposes

Here is the opinion in In the Matter of the Welfare of J.A.D.:

Alaska SCT Decides Cross-Border Jurisdictional Dispute over Indian Child

Here is the opinion in O’Brien v. Delaplain: