Here are the materials in Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria v. Ceiba Legal LLP (N.D. Cal.):
32 Individual Defendants Motion to Dismiss
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
“Life on the Pine Ridge Native American reservation” — Al Jazeera
Here.
More TICA/IPLC Conference Pics
TICA/ILPC Conference Pics
ILPC/TICA Conference Intro and Keynote
Corrected Navajo Nation RFP for Treasury Offset Work
Here:
2016-11-02 Reissue RFP Treasury Offsets Final
The description:
RFP REISSUE CLARIFYING NOVEMBER 9 RESPONSE DEADLINE: The Navajo Nation seeks assistance in litigation, administrative outreach, and lobbying to assist in matters related to federal administrative offsets made by the U.S. Department of the Treasury for disputed debts. Selected Respondent will provide legal services to secure a favorable outcome of the disputes and will litigate those disputes if necessary. The Navajo Nation Department of Justice will be accepting proposals for this service postmarked by 5:00 PM MT on Wednesday, November 9, 2016. NO LATE PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Ninth Circuit Remands Two Appeals Affected by U.S. v. Bryant
Here are the materials in United States v. Stewart.
Here are the materials in United States v. Kirkaldie.
Turtle Talk Poll Results — Nooksack Disenrollments
Few Turtle Talk readers support disenrolling the so-called Nooksack 306. The vast majority of TT readers think Nooksack should hold elections before disenrollments. There is a wide variety of opinions on which forum should resolve the disputes.
Question: Should the Nooksack 306 Be Disenrolled?
| COUNT | PERCENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
12 | 4.44% | ||
|
No |
202 | 74.81% | ||
|
Don’t Know |
56 | 20.74% | ||
Question: Should the Nooksack Tribe Hold Elections Before Proceeding with Disenrollments?
| COUNT | PERCENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
212 | 85.48% | ||
|
No |
25 | 10.08% | ||
|
Don’t Know |
11 | 4.44% | ||
Question: Which forum is the best place to resolve litigation arising from this dispute?
| COUNT | PERCENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nooksack tribal council (incl. Nooksack Supreme Court) |
14 | 5.45% | ||
|
Nooksack tribal judiciary |
89 | 34.63% | ||
|
Bureau of Indian Affairs |
51 | 19.84% | ||
|
Federal or state courts |
80 | 31.13% | ||
|
International forums |
7 | 2.72% | ||
|
Other |
16 | 6.23% | ||
Nooksack Update
Kelly v. Kelly (Nooksack Tr. Ct.):
Kelly v. Kelly Rejected Second Amended Complaint
Belmont v. Kelly (Nooksack Ct. App.):
Rejected Declarations Re Nooksack Member Voting Rights
Nooksack Indian Tribe v. NICS (Nooksack Tr. Ct.):
Response to Order to Show Cause
Declaration of of Daniel Kamkoff in Response to Order to Show Cause
Administrative Disenrollment Matter (Nooksack Tr. Council):
Omnibus Written Response of Nooksack Tribal Members Proposed for Disenrollment
Navajo Nation RFP — Treasury Offsets Work
Corrected notice here.
The description:
The Navajo Nation seeks assistance in litigation, administrative outreach, and lobbying to assist in matters related to federal administrative offsets made by the U.S. Department of the Treasury for disputed debts. Selected Respondent will provide legal services to secure a favorable outcome of the disputes and will litigate those disputes if necessary. The Navajo Nation Department of Justice will be accepting proposals for this service postmarked by 5:00 PM MT on Wednesday, November 9, 2016. NO LATE PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.