Here:
Via.
I think. The petition is a bit confusing. Here is the petition in Butler v. Montana:
Butler v Montana Cert Petition
Question presented (which tells us almost nothing):
The question presented is whether the justice of the peace, presiding over a court of no record, exercised jurisdiction over a sovereign nation in contravention of New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324, 338, 103 S. Ct. 2378, 2388-89, 76 L. Ed. 2d 611 (1983), and federal statutes conferring jurisdiction solely on the Navajo Nation by preventing Petitioner from hunting in the Navajo Nation.
Lower court decision, State v. Butler, here:
Apparently, this is an appeal to the Montana court’s order that Butler violated his probation he received for hunting violations in Montana because he went hunting on the Navajo Nation.
Just no.
Here are the materials in Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. Nelson (W.D. Wash.):
323 Ashley Motion for Summary J
339 Stillaguamish Response to Ashley Motion
342 Stillaguamish Response to Chapman and Nelson Motions
DCT Order on Defendants Motion for Summary J
Complaint and earlier materials here.
Here are the materials in the slow-moving Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
4-18-13 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss
Here, see pages 28-30.
Details here:
The AALS Indian Nations and Indigenous Peoples Section invites submissions on the topic “The Relationship Between Indian Law and Tribal Law” for the Section’s 2014 AALS conference panel. The American Indian Law Review has agreed to publish selected papers associated with this call (the Law Review of course reserves the final publication decision). Please submit full papers, not just abstracts, to the Section Chair, Ezra Rosser, at erosser@wcl.american.edu, by August 1, 2013. We anticipate interpreting the topic broadly, so please submit if you are doing work related to this year’s topic! The Section Executive Committee (in connection with the Law Review) will inform you if you have been chosen to be on the panel by August 14, 2013 so that you will know in time for the Spring Law Review submission cycle.
Here are the materials in Jacobs v. United States (D. S.D.):
DCT Order Denying Habeas Relief
Materials from Mr. Jacobs’ direct appeal of his conviction based on the 1868 Fort Laramie treaty is here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.