And today we conclude with a few leftover illustrations (I particularly like the one that illustrates Indian lawyering). Hope you enjoyed the previous posts here and here.




Yesterday, we covered tribal constitutions. Today, the political and bureaucratic complexity of enrollment decisions in cartoon form (we will conclude tomorrow):



Apparently, in 1977 or so, the Phoenix Area Office decided to write a lengthy manual for tribal governments, instructing them on how to make enrollment decisions that met tribal constitutional muster. Suffice it to say the text is TL:DR, but the illustrations are awesome — and by awesome, I mean crazy — and by crazy, I mean Indian country crazy.



Tomorrow, how tribal governments make membership decisions….
Here is the order in Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Here.
Here, by Nick Estes.
Here are the materials in Cross v. Dept. of Interior (D. Ariz.):
Here are the materials in Cayuga Nation v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
59 Reformatted Plaintiff Cayuga MSJ
Prior posts in Cayuga Nation v. Zinke here. IBIA decision here.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.