Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland.
Briefs here.
For commentary on legal analysis by reading the dictionary, see Joseph Kimball’s work on the Michigan Supreme Court’s use of dictionaries.

Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland.
Briefs here.
For commentary on legal analysis by reading the dictionary, see Joseph Kimball’s work on the Michigan Supreme Court’s use of dictionaries.

A really interesting look at the BIA Urban Relocation project.

Here are the materials in Delorme-Gaines v. Sweeney (D.N.D.):
Prior post here.
Traverse City Record-Eagle: “Bay Mills man tapped for Department of Interior post”
Radio News Network: “Upper Peninsula Man Sworn In As Assistant U.S. Interior Secretary”

Here is the complaint in Cavazos v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
An earlier suit was dismissed for failure to exhaust.
Yesterday, we covered tribal constitutions. Today, the political and bureaucratic complexity of enrollment decisions in cartoon form (we will conclude tomorrow):



Apparently, in 1977 or so, the Phoenix Area Office decided to write a lengthy manual for tribal governments, instructing them on how to make enrollment decisions that met tribal constitutional muster. Suffice it to say the text is TL:DR, but the illustrations are awesome — and by awesome, I mean crazy — and by crazy, I mean Indian country crazy.



Tomorrow, how tribal governments make membership decisions….
You must be logged in to post a comment.