cultural resources
Amicus Briefs in Support of Cert Petition in Sac & Fox Nation v. Borough of Jim Thorpe
NPR on Native Protests of Copper Mine in Arizona
The Ancient One is a Colville Ancestor
Here is “The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man” as published in Nature.
From the abstract:
Kennewick Man, referred to as the Ancient One by Native Americans, is a male human skeleton discovered in Washington state (USA) in 1996 and initially radiocarbon-dated to 8,340–9,200 calibrated years before present (bp)1. His population affinities have been the subject of scientific debate and legal controversy. Based on an initial study of cranial morphology it was asserted that Kennewick Man was neither Native American nor closely related to the claimant Plateau tribes of the Pacific Northwest, who claimed ancestral relationship and requested repatriation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The morphological analysis was important to judicial decisions that Kennewick Man was not Native American and that therefore NAGPRA did not apply. Instead of repatriation, additional studies of the remains were permitted2. Subsequent craniometric analysis affirmed Kennewick Man to be more closely related to circumpacific groups such as the Ainu and Polynesians than he is to modern Native Americans2. In order to resolve Kennewick Man’s ancestry and affiliations, we have sequenced his genome to ~1× coverage and compared it to worldwide genomic data including the Ainu and Polynesians. We find that Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide. Among the Native American groups for whom genome-wide data are available for comparison, several seem to be descended from a population closely related to that of Kennewick Man, including the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville), one of the five tribes claiming Kennewick Man. We revisit the cranial analyses and find that, as opposed to genomic-wide comparisons, it is not possible on that basis to affiliate Kennewick Man to specific contemporary groups. We therefore conclude based on genetic comparisons that Kennewick Man shows continuity with Native North Americans over at least the last eight millennia.
American Indian Prisoner Religious Freedom Complaint
Here is the complaint in McCarter v. Beard (C.D. Cal.):
Federal Court Declines to Block Solar Project affecting CRIT Sacred Sites
Here are the materials in Colorado River Indian Tribes v. Dept. of Interior (C.D. Cal.):
We posted the complaint here.
Ninth Circuit Materials Navajo Nation NAGPRA Dispute with Federal Government
Here are the briefs in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of Interior:
Oral argument video and audio.
CA9 opinion here. Opinion after settlement here.
District court materials:
An excerpt:
This action stems from the long-standing desire of the plaintiff, the Navajo Nation, to obtain the immediate repatriation of 303 sets of human remains and other associated cultural objects removed by the National Park Service (“NPS”) from the Canyon de Chelly National Monument (“the Monument”), which is a unit of the NPS located within the exterior boundaries of the Navajo Reservation; the human remains and cultural objects at issue are currently being held by the NPS at its Western Archeology Conservation Center in Tucson, Arizona.
Environmental group initiates FOIA lawsuit against NPS for new rule allowing Tribes to gather in National Parks
The materials are here, on PEER’s website. Among the arguments being made are that tribes are not entitled to “special rights” for gathering on NPS lands, absent an act of Congress.
Federal Court Dismisses American Indian Arts and Crafts Act Claim for Lack of Article III Standing
Here are the materials in Native American Arts v. Peter Stone Co. (N.D. Ill.):
250 Peter Stone Motion for Summary J on Standing
267 Peter Stone Motion for Summary J
271-1 Native American Arts Motion for Summary J
279 Native American Arts Response to 250
Ninth Circuit Evaluates Contours of Migratory Bird Treaty Act in Criminal Appeal for Selling Eagle Fans
Here is the opinion in United States v. Crooked Arm.
From the court’s syllabus:
The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss for failure to state a felony claim an indictment charging two defendants with violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, vacated the sentences, and remanded.
The defendants argued that the counts to which they conditionally pled guilty were improperly charged as felonies because it is only a misdemeanor under the MBTA to sell
migratory bird feathers.The panel held that even under the defendants’ interpretation of the MBTA, Count I, which charges a conspiracy to kill, transport, and offer for sale and sell migratory birds, including bald and golden eagles, charges a felony.
The panel held that in regard to Count II, which charges unlawful trafficking in migratory bird parts, the allegations state a misdemeanor only.
You must be logged in to post a comment.