Cachil Dehe Band v. California — Ninth Circuit Affirms Rule 19 Dismissal of Claim against State

Rule 19 (my favorite FRCP) strikes again!

Here is the opinion in Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians v. State of California: cachil-dehe-band-v-california-ca9-opinion

And the briefs:

cachil-dehe-band-brief

california-brief-cachil-dehe-band

tribal-amicus-brief-cachil-dehe-band-case

Indian Tribal Businesses and the Off-Reservation Market

My submission to the Lewis & Clark Law Review’s symposium issue on tribal economic development, “Indian Tribal Businesses and the Off-Reservation Market” is on SSRN. If it’s not available yet, it will be in a few days. Here’s the abstract:

The pre-American trading centers of the Great Lakes – Sault Ste. Marie, Michilimackinac, and Detroit – developed as natural manifestations of economic activity involving the Indigenous peoples of the region, as well as the French, the British, and lastly the Americans. In many ways, during that period, the Indian people controlled these markets. As history turned against the Indians, the Europeans acquired control of these markets. The federal Indian law and policy manifestation of this control can be explained in the phrase “measured separatism.” While measured separatism had value for Indian and American communities for a time, as well as serious disadvantages, the need Indian law controls over the market has receded to a significant extent. The recent limitations on off-reservation gaming are manifestations of this measured separatism. These controls should be a call for tribal business interests to drop some of their reliance on federal Indian law, which creates some economic advantages, and re-enter the larger economic world.

Beltran v. Harrah’s Arizona Corp. — Tort Claim Against Casino

The Arizona Court of Appeals, Division 2, affirmed the dismissal of a tort complaint against the management company for the Ak-Chin Indian Community. The plaintiffs had filed a tribal court claim that had been dismissed for procedural reasons (failure to identify the proper party).

Opinion

beltran-v-harrahs-appellee-brief

[appellant’s briefs unavailable]

Soo Tribe Layoffs

From Indianz:

The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians plans to lay off about two percent of its workforce.

Chairman Joe McCoy said the tribe’s financial situation forced the reduction. “Unfortunately, over the years, millions in tribal reserves has been dwindled down to nothing. According to financial analysts, if changes are not made, the tribe will not recover,” he said in a press release. The layoffs affect employees of Kewadin Casinos and employees of the tribal government. Based on recent figures, it looks like about 80 people will lose their jobs. The tribe already laid off 89 people at the Greektown Casino in Detroit. The tribe has a majority stake in the commercial casino, which is undergoing a restructuring in federal bankruptcy court.

Get the Story:
Press Release: Soo Tribe and Kewadin Casino to restructure (SooToday 7/30)

GTB Revenue Sharing for the 1st Half of 2008

Here is the press release — 2-first-half-2008-press-release-07-30-08

D.C. Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing in MichGo v. Kempthorne

Here is the order — michgo-rehearing-denial

Three judges (Sentelle, Griffith, and Rogers) voted to rehear the case en banc, three short of the necessary votes. Of course, that semi-near miss gives the attorneys for MichGO fodder for making noise about a cert petition (see news report here).

I really have to think that this case is getting so much attention — not because of the merits of the case — but because these same lawyers have been working on three cases so far (TOMAC, CETAC, and now MichGO) and this is finally the end. It bears repeating that these three cases were all carbon-copy cases, with little to differentiate them at all. They have almost no merit whatsoever, and even the D.C. Circuit all but labeled them frivolous in the CETAC opinion. The Gun Lake case is no different than the previous cases, except it is the last one.

Fruitport Backs LRB Off-Reservation Casino Proposal

From Indianz:

The Little River Band of Ottawa Indians won support for its off-reservation casino in Muskegon, Michigan.

The Fruitport Township Board voted 4-3 on a resolution in favor of the casino at the defunct Great Lakes Downs. Residents said they welcomed the jobs the facility would create. The tribe operates the Little River Casino on its reservation, about 80 miles from the proposed gaming site.

Get the Story:
Divided Fruitport Township Board supports casino (The Muskegon Chronicle 7/29)

Nebraska v. US DOI et al — Ponca Restored Lands Decision

Here are the materials in this case, filed in the Southern District of Iowa.

neb-v-doi-complaint [includes NIGC legal memorandum and NIGC Final Decision]

neb-v-doi-us-motion-to-dismiss

Erik Jensen on Gaming on Newly-Acquired Indian Lands

Erik Jensen has published “Indian Gaming on Newly Acquired Lands” in the Washburn Law Journal, and it is available on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This symposium article examines the meaning of the term “Indian lands” – the lands that might become sites for Indian gaming-in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. At its core, the term is unambiguous: it includes reservations and other lands that, at the time of IGRA’s enactment, were held in trust by the United States for the benefit of American Indian nations. But “Indian lands” can include much more. Indeed, it is possible for real estate having only the most tenuous historical connections with a tribe (perhaps having no connections at all) to become “Indian lands.” The treatment of so-called “newly acquired lands” has potentially far-reaching economic consequences for American Indian nations, but also for non-Indian populations, which can share in the benefits of tribal economic development. Along the way, the article discusses the basics of IGRA, recent developments affecting newly acquired lands, and whether an expansive conception of “Indian lands” is a good thing.

Ho-Chunk Nation Reply Brief in HCN v. Wisconsin Cert Petition

Here is it: hcn-reply-brief

And here is the cert opposition: wisconsin-cert-opposition

Earlier materials are here.