The Seventh Circuit remanded (again) the dispute over the revenue sharing provisions of the Class III gaming compact between the State of Wisconsin and the Ho-Chunk Nation.
The briefs are here:
The Seventh Circuit remanded (again) the dispute over the revenue sharing provisions of the Class III gaming compact between the State of Wisconsin and the Ho-Chunk Nation.
The briefs are here:
From the New London Day:
It is a contentious battle, which pits an Indian tribe that operates one of the most successful casinos in the world against one of the largest unions in North America.
From the NYTs:
The slot-machine casino in Monticello was nearly empty on Wednesday afternoon.
A case involving the collection of attorney fees from a gaming developer.
This is tribal sovereign immunity case. The district court granted the tribe’s motion to dismiss. Here are the materials:
From the Grand Rapids Press:
STANDISH – It opened with little fanfare: no billboards, no advertisements, not even an announcement on the Web site. Just some spotlights, shining in the night from the quiet darkness.
More coverage from the Kalamazoo Gazette and the Muskegon Chronicle. The Chronicle’s coverage denotes significant skepticism:
The standing-room-only crowd at the casino presentation by the Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians left Muskegon City Hall on Monday night wondering whether the western Upper Peninsula tribe’s proposal was realistic.
Last week, the Department of Interior rejected fee-to-trust applications for eleven tribes . Matthew has linked to the rejection letters elsewhere on this site. In rejecting these applications, the DoI has changed the method by which it will review all fee-to-trust applications under 25 C.F.R. Part 151. On January 3rd, Assistant Secretary of Interior Carl Artman , issued a letter to the BIA’s Regional Directors that established that all future applications will be subjected to a “commutable distance” test. In other words, if a tribe seeks to have land placed into trust, even for non-gaming economic development purposes, it must be within a distance where tribal citizens on the existing reservation can reasonably commute to jobs at the site. This had previously not been the case.
From Indianz:
The Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians is seeking an off-reservation casino in Muskegon, Michigan.
The Plaintiff has petitioned the State Supreme Court for review.
I don’t have a copy of the Plaintiff’s new petition (assuming there is one), but the petition she filed in October of 2006 is posted in the first message in this thread. The Tribe’s Answer to the Petition for Review (filed in mid-December) is available here.
Our previous posts with lower court materials are here and here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.