Here:

Here is the opinion in Apache Stronghold v. United States.
Links to briefs and other materials here.

Lessons Learned: Healing to Wellness
March 14, 2024 on Zoom Webinar
11-3pm ET | 10-2pm CT | 9-1pm MT | 8-12pm PT | 7-11am AKT
Registration now open at https://www.tjstraining.com/
We in the legal profession need to look at alternatives to incarceration and probation, which can have negative impacts on individuals. We instead need to provide independent, traditional, and cultural remedies as alternatives and shift our focus toward healing communities. Join us as we discuss the intrinsic value of Healing to Wellness Courts and their community-specific services, stories, and funding.
Below times are listed in ET:
11:00-11:20am Introduction; Review of Penobscot’s Healing to Wellness Conference
11:20-12:30pm Session 1: Service Providers
12:45-1:45pm Session 2: Success Stories
2:00-2:30pm Session 3: Federal Funding, Where To Find It
2:30-3:00pm Closing Thoughts & Lessons Learned


Here is the complaint in Spotted Hawk Development LLC v. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation (D.N.D.):

Gabriel R. Sanchez, A-dae Romero-Briones, and Raymond Foxworth have published “Murdered and missing women is the top issue facing Native American communities heading into the 2024 elections.”


Here is the decision — In the Matter of the September 29, 2022, Approval of Howard Bros. Inc.’s Application of Septage on the Plummer 7 Lot, in the Town of Lac du Flambeau, County of Vilas, State of Wisconsin:

Here are new materials in Pakootas v. Teck Caminco (E.D. Wash.):

Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether IGRA authorizes the approval of a compact that purports to allow for an online sports gambling monopoly throughout the state and off Indian lands.
2. Whether an IGRA compact violates the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act if it provides for internet sports betting that is unlawful where many of the bets are placed.
3. Whether the Secretary’s approval of a tribalstate compact violates equal protection principles where it provides a specific tribe with a monopoly on online sports gaming off tribal lands, while state law makes that conduct a felony for everyone else.
Lower court materials here.

Here:
Questions presented:
Whether the decision of the court of appeals conflicts with Carcieri?
Lower court materials here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.