Here is the unpublished opinion:
Briefs here.
Here (scroll down to the second audio player).
From the NY Times:
There was a time when the murky waters of the Skagit River offered bountiful salmon harvests to the Swinomish Indians of Washington State. They could fill an entire boat with one cast of the net back then, and even on a slow day, they could count on hauling in dozens of fish.
But on a cloudy morning last month, the tribal community chairman, Brian Cladoosby, was having no luck. Drifting in his 21-foot Boston Whaler, he spotted his 84-year-old father, Michael, standing in yellow overalls in another boat, pulling an empty net from the water.
“Where’s the fish, Dad?” the son asked.
That has been the dominant question for years among the Swinomish and other Native Americans, who have seen their salmon harvests dip by about 75 percent over the past three decades.
But on Monday, they got reason to hope that their salmon harvests would tick back up.
Article is HERE.
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington subproceeding 18-02 (W.D. Wash.), aka Swinomish Indian Tribe v. Lummi Indian Tribe:
Here is the petition in Makah Indian Tribe v. Quileute Indian Tribe & Quinault Indian Tribe:
2018-05-21 makah cert petition and appendix
Question presented:
The question presented is whether the Ninth Circuit—in conflict with the decisions of this Court and other courts—properly held the Treaty of Olympia confers this expansive “fishing” right.
Lower court materials in United States v. Washington subproceeding 09-01 here.
Here:
Update (5-30-18):
supplemental brief for respondent in response to brief of us solicitor general
Here are the materials in Washington State Dept. of Licensing v. Cougar Den Inc.
You must be logged in to post a comment.