Galanda v Bernard Rejected Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
In re Gabriel Galanda v Nooksack Tribal Court REJECTED Motion to Enforce Contempt Order
Link to previous coverage here.
Cert Petition regarding the question of the Little River Band’s criminal jurisdiction over off-reservation crimes affecting core tribal government interests.
Questions presented:
1. Whether Indian tribes can prosecute their members for acts that occur outside the tribe’s territory absent Congressional authorization; and
2. Whether the Band’s retroactive expansion of a narrow and precise jurisdictional statute to encompass an extraterritorial act previously outside its plain terms violates the due process protections of the Indian Civil Rights Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1302(a), and Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 647 (1964).
No. 16-5120 Kelsey Cert Petition
Prior posts on Kelsey v. Pope, including lower court decisions, are here.
Here is the opinion in Aguayo v. Jewell.
An excerpt:
This appeal analyzes whether the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it concluded that, according to tribal law, it had no authority to intervene in a tribal membership dispute, in which more than 150 people were disenrolled from the Pala Band of Mission Indians (Pala Band or Band). We conclude that it did not, and affirm the decision of the district court.
Appellate Briefs:
Doc. 13 – Appellant’s Opening Brief
Doc. 23 – Answering Brief of the Federal Defendants
Doc. 21 – Appellant’s Reply Brief
Lower court materials here
Here is the May 27th order:
May 25th order previously posted here.
Here are new pleadings filed in Galanda v. Bernard (Nooksack Ct. App.):
Galanda v. Bernard Pro Se Petitioners’ Appellate Motion for Show Cause Re Contempt
Nooksack Tribal Court Letter to Galanda Broadman Lawyers Refusing Pro Se Appearance
Here is a new filing in Belmont v. Kelly (Nooksack Ct. App.):
Here is the complaint and exhibits in John v. Brown (N.D. Cal.):
Here is the complaint in Gladstone v. Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Court):
Here is “Elem Pomo File Federal Suit Against Banishment.”
Here is the complaint in John et. al. v. Garcia et. al., 16-cv-02368 (N.D. Cali.)
An excerpt:
At this time it is unclear who will be defending the federal suit, Boland said. Last week, the Elem Colony Executive Committee’s longtime general counsel, Tony Cohen, publicly stated that he withdrew his representation in a blog post.
He said that in his 35 years practicing Indian law, “I have always worked to improve the lives of tribal members and have never helped tribal governments to be oppressors.”
Link to Craigslist ad here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.