Vox: “6 Native leaders on what it would look like if the US kept its promises”

By Rory Taylor, here.

Swinomish Loses Contract Support Costs Dispute with Indian Health Service

Here are the materials in Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Azar (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

21-2 Swinomish MSJ

27 US Cross-Motion

29 Swinomish Reply

32 US Reply

36 DCT Order

An excerpt:

The question in this case is whether, when a tribe collects its own third-party revenue pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(1), its expenditures of those funds on health care services are eligible for CSC funding from the IHS under the ISDEAA, id. §§ 5325, 5388.

Osage Headright Owners’ Trust Breach Claims against US

Here is the complaint in Fletcher v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

1 Complaint

 

 

Navajo Water Rights Trust Breach Case Dismissed

Here are the updated materials in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Arizona):

Third Amended Complaint materials

339 US Response

340 Utility and State Response

346 Navajo Reply

360-1 Navajo Renewed Motion

369 Utility and State Response

370 US Response

375 Navajo Reply

385 DCT Order

Prior posts here.

Federal Circuit Briefs in Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona v. United States

Here:

Opening Brief

Federal Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Materials in Cook Inlet Tribal Council Suit against Indian Health Service

Here are the materials in Cook Inlet Tribal Council v. Mandregan (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

13-1 Tribe MSJ

15 IHS Cross MSJ

18 Tribe Reply

21 IHS Reply

39 DCT Order

40 Tribe Bill of Costs

41 Tribe Motion for Atty Fees

42 IHS Response to 40

43 IHS Motion for Reconsideration

44 Tribe Reply in Support of 41

51 Tribe Cross Motion for Reconsideration

58 IHS Response to 41

60 IHS Reply in Support of 43

61 Tribe Reply in Support of 41

65 DCT Order

Federal Court Refuses to Allow Law Firm to Intervene in Trust Breach Suit to Collect Fees against Tribe

Here are the materials in Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):

69 Herman Law Motion to Intervene

72 Yankton Response

74 Reply

88 Yankton Supplemental Brief

90 Herman Law Supplemental Brief

110 DCT Order

Update in San Pasqual Band Membership Suits

Here are the materials in Alegre v. United States (S.D. Cal.):

44 second Amended Complaint

46-1 US Motion to Dismiss

48 Response

49 Reply

50-1 Individual Defendants MTD

53 Response

59 DCT Order Dismissing SAC

62 Third Amended Complaint

68-1 US Motion to Dismiss

79 Response

83 Individual Defendants Reply

85 US Reply

98 DCT Order Dismissing Third Amended Complaint

Federal Circuit Rejects Indian Leaseholder Claims

Here is the opinion in Moody v. United States.

Briefs:

Opening Brief

US Answer Brief

Reply Brief

Lower court materials here.

Interior & Spokane Tribe Prevail over Spokane County & Kalispel Tribe re: Spokane Casino

Here are the materials in Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Wash.):

79 Kalispe MSJ

82 Spokane County MSJ

96 Spokane Tribe Cross MSJ

98 DOI Cross MSJ

113 Kalispel Reply

114 Spokane County Reply

115 Spokane Tribe Reply

116 DOI Reply

118 DCT Order

We posted the complaint here.