South Dakota Federal Court Finally Resolves Matter Arising from Federal Government’s Impoundment of Livestock at Pine Ridge Way Back in 2015 and 2016

Here are the materials in Temple v. Roberts (D.S.D.):

180-1 Oglala Sioux Tribal Court Decision

213 Federal Trial Brief

215 Temple Pre-Trial Brief

228 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Pretty sure these dudes didn’t have anything to do with this case, but they look cool — Ed Red Owl, Jerry Flute and Elijah Back Thunder

SCOTUS Grants and Consolidates Indian Health Service Cert Petitions on Contract Support Costs for Third Party Income

Here was yesterday’s order list.

The petitions are here.

CFC Allows Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Trust Breach Claim to Proceed

Here are the materials so far in Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

13 Amended Complaint

83 US Motion for Summary J

95 CRST Response

98 Reply

112 DCT Order

Heather Tanana to Speak at UMLS Next Week

Utah Federal Court Dismisses Ute Water-Related Breach of Trust Claims

Here are the materials in Ute Indian Tribe v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Utah):

199 Water District Motion to Dismiss

200 US Motion to Dismiss

201 Utah Motion to Dismiss

207 Response to Water District Motion

208 Response to State Motion

210 Response to US Motion

214 Utah Reply

215 US Reply

216 Water District Reply

244 DCT Order

Prior post here.

United States Seeks SCOTUS Review of Decisions Awarding Contract Support Costs to Tribal Health Clinics

Here is the petition in Beccera v. Northern Arapaho Tribe:

Question presented:

Whether IHS must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties.

Lower court materials here.

Here is the petition in Beccera v. San Carlos Apache Tribe:

The question presented is the same in both cases.

Lower court materials here.

Court of Federal Claims Dismisses Suit against U.S. Arising from Winnemucca Leadership Dispute

Here are the materials in Winnemucca Indian Colony v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

Kevin Washburn on the Biden-Harris Administration’s Expanding Work with Tribes

Kevin Washburn has posted “The March of Co-Management — The Biden-Harris Administration’s Expanding Work with Tribes” on SSRN.

Here is the abstract:

In response to a request from the Foundation of Natural Resources and Environmental Law for a description of the Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to increase the role of tribal communities in federal land management, this essay provides a variety of ways that the Biden-Harris Administration has worked to provide a stronger relationship between the federal government and tribal governments. These efforts include historic appointments of Native Americans to significant positions, especially in the areas governing natural resources in the federal government. It also includes better processes for incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into decision making, enhancing efforts at tribal consultation, and dramatically increased appropriations for tribal governments. The essay also explains how tribes fit within broader administration priorities, such as the American the Beautiful initiative to conserve 30 percent of American land by 2030, and the Justice 40 initiative, providing 40 percent of federally-appropriated funds invested in support of the clean energy transition to communities burdened by traditional energy infrastructure.

SCOTUS Rejects Navajo Nation’s Water Rights Trust Claim 5-4

Here is the opinion in Arizona v. Navajo Nation.

Background materials here.

Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Suit over Monacan Intra-Tribal Political Dispute

Here are the materials in Brooks v. Burnham (W.D. Va.):

Tchochke