Here are the materials in Winnemucca Indian Colony v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
trust relationship
Kevin Washburn on the Biden-Harris Administration’s Expanding Work with Tribes
Kevin Washburn has posted “The March of Co-Management — The Biden-Harris Administration’s Expanding Work with Tribes” on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
In response to a request from the Foundation of Natural Resources and Environmental Law for a description of the Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to increase the role of tribal communities in federal land management, this essay provides a variety of ways that the Biden-Harris Administration has worked to provide a stronger relationship between the federal government and tribal governments. These efforts include historic appointments of Native Americans to significant positions, especially in the areas governing natural resources in the federal government. It also includes better processes for incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into decision making, enhancing efforts at tribal consultation, and dramatically increased appropriations for tribal governments. The essay also explains how tribes fit within broader administration priorities, such as the American the Beautiful initiative to conserve 30 percent of American land by 2030, and the Justice 40 initiative, providing 40 percent of federally-appropriated funds invested in support of the clean energy transition to communities burdened by traditional energy infrastructure.
SCOTUS Rejects Navajo Nation’s Water Rights Trust Claim 5-4
Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Suit over Monacan Intra-Tribal Political Dispute
Here are the materials in Brooks v. Burnham (W.D. Va.):

South Dakota Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Oglala Sioux Tribe’s Demand for Federal Law Enforcement Funding
Here are the updated materials in Oglala Sioux Tribe v. United States (D.S.D.):
Prior post with additional briefs here.

Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation Cert Petition [Rule 19 & Tribal Immunity]
Here:
Question presented:
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder.
Lower court materials here.

SCOTUSBlog Preview of Arizona v. Navajo Nation
Update in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Land Claim against United States and City of Pocatello
Here are the materials in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. United States (D. Idaho):
114-1 Tribe Motion to Reconsider
Prior post here.

Fond du Lac Ojibwe Challenge to Mine Survives Motion to Dismiss in Minnesota Federal Court
Here are the materials so far in Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. Cummins (D. Minn.):

CFC Dismisses Blackfeet Tribal Member’s Trust Breach Claims
Here are the materials in Gilham v. United States (Fed. Cl.):


You must be logged in to post a comment.