Sneak Preview of ANOTHER Benally-Singel-Fletcher Talk Later Today, This One Called “Are We Still NDN?”

Yes, it’s gonna be at least partially about equal protection matters post-Brackeen, so perhaps it should be called “Shitting On Our Parade.” [comic book here]

Sneak Preview of Benally-Singel-Fletcher Conversation about Contract Law @ Columbia Law School Later Today

Can’t promise what’s gonna transpire, but happy to share some images. . . . full comic here.

Montana Law Releases National NALSA Moot Court Competition Problem

Here.

The National Native American Law Student Association (NNALSA), in partnership with the University of Montana, Alexander Blewett III School of Law NALSA Chapter, are excited to host the 32nd Annual NNALSA Moot Court Competition.

Registration Opens Friday, November 3rd, 2023 at 12:00 a.m. MST

First Tribal Title IV-B 477 Integration

I am very excited about this. It’s the first step in loosening up the restrictions on HHS money that needs to be flowing to tribes for social service and justice systems.

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/media/press/2023/first-tribal-integration-title-iv-b-child-welfare-programs-477-plan

The new integration comes under Public Law 102-477 (P.L. 102-477). Specifically, ACF recommended, and BIA approved for Citizen Potawatomi Nation, to integrate its child welfare services grants with several other federal grants for employment, training and related services into a single program and budget to address Tribal priorities. 

“Public Law 102-477 has long been critical legislation for ACF to promote Tribal sovereignty, and expansion to include new ACF programs helps meet our nation-to-nation responsibilities,” said ACF Acting Assistant Secretary Jeff Hild. “The feedback we hear from our Tribal advisory committee and Tribal leaders is Tribes know best how to serve their citizens, and 477 is one way to do this.” 

Under P.L. 102-477, Tribes can integrate their federal employment, training and related services from across the federal government to improve the effectiveness of those services. Tribes wishing to integrate a program into a 477 plan must first submit a proposed plan to DOI that identifies the programs to be integrated and consolidated. Once a program is included in such a plan, Tribes have very broad flexibility in use of those funds. 

Wyoming Federal Court Confirms Energy Company’s Arbitration Award against Wind River Tribes

Here are the materials in Merit Energy Operations I LLC v. Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes (D. Wyo.):

1 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award

16 Motion to Dismiss

20 Opposition

31 Reply

32 DCT Order

New Student Scholarship on Trust Land Acquisitions for Alaska Tribal Nations

Alexis Studler has posted “Reviving Indian Country: Expanding Alaska Native Villages’ Tribal Land Bases Through Fee-to-Trust Acquisitions,” forthcoming in the Michigan Journal of Race & Law, on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

For the last fifty years, the possibility of fee-to-trust acquisitions in Alaska has been precarious at best. This is largely due to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 (ANCSA), which eschewed the traditional reservation system in favor of corporate land ownership and management. Despite its silence on trust acquisitions, ANCSA was and still is cited as the primary prohibition to trust acquisitions in Alaska. Essentially, ANCSA both reduced Indian Country in Alaska and prohibited any opportunities to create it, leaving Alaska Native Villages without the significant territorial jurisdiction afforded to Lower 48 tribes. However, recent policy changes from the Department of Interior reaffirmed the eligibility of trust acquisitions post-ANCSA and a proposed rule from the Bureau of Indian Affairs signals a favorable presumption of approval for Alaska Native fee-to-trust applications. This Note reviews the history and controversy of trust acquisitions in Alaska, and more importantly, it demonstrates the methods in which Alaska Native Villages may still acquire fee land for trust acquisitions after ANCSA.

D.C. Federal Court Dismisses Eastern Pequot Effort to Move Acknowledgement Petition Forward Faster

Here are the materials in Historical Eastern Pequot Tribe v. Office of Acknowledgment (D.D.C.):

17 Second Amended Complaint

16 Motion to Dismiss

19 Opposition

20 Reply

22 DCT Order

Canadian shit, I know.

SCOTUS Declines to Review Ninth Circuit’s Rule 19/Tribal Immunity Decision

Here is Monday’s order list.

The petition was Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation: petition and opposition briefs.

Native America Calling Episode about Enforcing ICWA Today @ 1PM Eastern

Here. Description:

A non-Native woman in Alaska refuses to abide by a tribal court order to turn an Alaska Native foster child over to the girl’s family members. It’s a blatant disregard of tribal sovereignty even after a notable re-affirmation of the Indian Child Welfare Act by the U.S. Supreme Court. The woman took custody of the child, named Chanel, at the request of the girl’s father, right before he was convicted of murdering Chanel’s mother during a domestic dispute. We’ll look at that case, as well as efforts to bolster ICWA compliance elsewhere.

Case materials here.