Here.
The Supreme Court of Canada materials on Her Majesty the Queen v. Richard Lee Desautel are here.
Here is the order:
9.25.20-Native-Ancestral-Lands-Policy
David Sandino commentary on this order here:
The first people of California occupied the state tens of thousands of years before European contact. The entire state of California was Tribal lands. Slowly but surely, the lands were taken away from the Tribes, first by the Spanish government, next by the Mexican government, next by the U.S. after the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and finally by California after it became a state in 1850. In the 1850’s, the U.S. negotiated 18 treaties with some of the Tribes, reserving about 9 percent of the state for these Tribal nations. However, the treaties were opposed by California senators, never ratified by the Senate, and hidden from public view by the Senate for 50 years. In recognition of these past injustices, on September 25, Governor Newsom issued a Statement of Administration Policy giving Native Americans the opportunity to access, co-manage, and acquire lands now owned by the state. The state has substantial land holdings under the jurisdiction of the State Lands Commission and other state agencies. California’s largest landowner by far is the federal government, owning 46% of the state.

Here are the materials in Thunderhawk v. County of Morton (D.N.D.):
38 TigerSwan Answer + Counterclaim
45-1 Motion to Dismiss TigerSwan Counterclaim
56 TigerSwam Answer + 2d Counterclaim
67-1 Motion to Dismiss TigerSwan 2d Counterclaim
71 County Reply in Support of 49
76 State Reply in Support of 52
85 TigerSwan Reply in Support of 82
Here:
Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Motion to Take Judicial Notice
Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants
Lower court materials here.

Indian Child Welfare Act Webinar – in 2 weeks
October 21
2:00-3:30 pm Pacific time
ASU Law’s Indian Legal Program is proud to host a webinar on the latest developments in the implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Please join us for an engaging session with panelists:
Register for free webinar at: law.asu.edu/icwa
Here.
Here are the briefs relevant to the sovereign immunity issue in Deschutes River Alliance v. Portland General Electric Company:
Final Tribal Amici Brief in Support of Warm Springs – File-Stamped
Second Brief on Cross-Appeal – CTWS (filed 9 28 20)
And here are the lower court materials in Deschutes River Alliance v. Portland General Electric Company (D. Or.):
72 Warm Springs Motion to Dismiss
74 Pacific Gas Motion to Dismiss
Here are the materials so far in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding 20-01, aka Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe:
Update (11-12-2020):
28 Sauk-Suiattle Response to 24
31 Upper Skagit Reply in Support of 24
34 Upper Skagit Response to 27
Here is “Rez Connectivity, Human Rights ‘Necessity’” from the Esperanza Project.
Here are the materials in Lacy v. Snohomish County (Wash. Ct. App.):
4-15-19 Appellant’s Opening Brief
5-17-19 Respondent Cross Appellant’s Brief
6-14-19 Appellant’s Reply Brief
Prior post here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.