Here are the materials in Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Kennedy (D. D.C.):
71 Salt River Motion for Summary J
74 Federal Motion for Summary J

Here are the materials in Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Kennedy (D. D.C.):
71 Salt River Motion for Summary J
74 Federal Motion for Summary J

Here are the new materials in San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States (D. Ariz.):
105 Tribe Motion for Preliminary Injunction
116 Resolution Copper Opposition

Here are the new materials in Birdbear v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
366 Plaintiffs Post Trial Brief
Prior post here.

Here is the petition in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Michigan:
Question presented:
Whether a district court has “inherent equitable power” to enter a coercive “decree” restricting an Indian tribe’s treaty rights without its consent and without satisfying this Court’s well-established standards for injunctive relief.
Lower court materials here.
Here is the complaint in United States v. United Nuclear Corp. (D. N.M.):

UPDATE: Here are the materials for the proposed consent decree.
On August 11, 2025, the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, Fort Yuma Quechan Indian Tribe, Chemeheuvi Indian Tribe, Colorado River Indian Tribes, and Morongo Band of Mission Indians, moved to intervene in Torongo v. Burgum, a case that threatens the long-sought designation of the Chuckwalla National Monument. Tribal Nations led the effort to establish Chuckwalla National Monument. The challenge to the monument is brought in federal court by a Michigan resident who purportedly has mining claims within the monument boundaries and a national off-road vehicle special interest group.
More here.

Complaint is here:
Here is the opinion in In re Ja.O.

Here are the materials in Nansemond Indian Nation v. Commonwealth of Virginia (E.D. Va.):
Complaint here.

Here are materials in Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation v. Ure (D. Utah):
78 Utah School Motion to Dismiss

You must be logged in to post a comment.