Utah Diné Bikéyah & Patagonia and Others Sue Trump over Bears Ears, Too

Here is the complaint in Utah Diné Bikéyah v. Trump (D.D.C.):

2017.12.06 – Bears Ears Complaint (filed)

Here is the complaint in Natural Resources Defense Council v. Trump (D.D.C.):

NRDC Complaint

St. Croix Ojibwe Opioid Suit

Here is  the complaint in St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. McKesson Corp. (W.D. Wis.):

Complaint

American Indian Scholarship Update

Here are selected papers available online:

Reimagining Relocation in a Regulatory Void: The Inadequacy of Existing Us Federal and State Regulatory Responses to Kivalina’s Climate Displacement in the Alaskan Arctic

Climate Law, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 290–321 (2017) ,
Posted: 05 Dec 2017
Accepted Paper Series

 

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow – Is Global Climate Change Another White Man’s Trick to Get Indian Land? The Role of Treaties in Protecting Tribes As They Adapt to Climate Change

Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2017
Number of pages: 54 Posted: 27 Nov 2017
Accepted Paper Series

Tribal Sovereignty and the Recognition Power

Number of pages: 77 Posted: 08 Nov 2017
Working Paper Series
Stanford Law School

The Body Subject To The Laws: Louise Erdrich’s Metaphorical Incarnation Of Federal Indian Law In “The Round House”

Laurel Jimenez
2017University of Washington Tacoma

Parchment As Power: The Effects Of Pre-Revolutionary Treaties On Native Americans From The Colonial Period To Present

Katie Wilkinson
2017Purdue University

Accounting for Conquest: The Price of the Louisiana Purchase of Indian Country

Journal of American History, Volume 103, Issue 4, 1 March 2017, Pages 921–942, https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaw504
Published:
01 March 2017

Alaska OCS-Tribal Services Compact

We’ve been getting a number of questions about this compact, likely due to the level and type of press coverage about it in Alaska (see here). We’ve hesitated to post on it, given all the people who know it much better than we do, but it’s important to see what this compact does and doesn’t do.

The compact is HERE (now as a searchable PDF because that’s how we do things).

The compact is, without question, a big step forward for the state of Alaska. It is the result of a lot of hard work of a lot of tribes, and opens doors that Alaska has long kept closed to tribes. There is recognition of tribal court protection and child support orders, as well as ensuring a child’s eligibility for federal funding regardless of tribal or state custody. The compact (Sec. 6.2.1) allows for the sharing of confidential information, and access to databases. This section alone are of particular importance and relevant for all tribes facing state intransigence on confidentiality and child welfare.

The compact is not the final step, however. The document provides an agreed upon framework for future negotiations between the state and individual tribes or tribal consortiums. The compact allows the state (OCS) to shift responsibility for providing services–and importantly, the related state funding–to tribal social services departments. But the compact does not address tribal jurisdiction, transfer to tribal court, or assume that if a tribal department takes over services that the tribe will take jurisdiction. Therefore, the compact doesn’t address tribal courts at all, or if state funding follows a child in to tribal court (spoiler alert: right now it doesn’t).

There are a lot of tribes in Alaska increasing their tribal court capacity right now, and it does seem the next step would be for tribes to exercise jurisdiction over their children without losing the funding due to those children as state citizens. It will also be interesting to see the individual tribal/tribal consortium compacts that address the details of how the services will be divided between the state and tribe.

Bears Ears National Monument Panel at Michigan Law: Nina Mendelson, Riyaz Kanji, and Wenona Singel

Nick Reo & Kyle Whyte et al. on Indigenous Principles for Cooperating on Great Lakes Conservation

Nick Reo, Kyle Whyte, and others have posted “Seven Indigenous principles for successful cooperation in Great Lakes conservation initiatives.”

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Amicus Briefs on Tribal Immunity Issue

Here are the amici curiae in the matter of Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe et al:

For Movants:

In Opposition:

Link: Case archive

NCAI Webinar: Tribal Leasing and Self-Governance Under the HEARTH Act

Please register for Tribal Leasing and Self-Governance Under the HEARTH Act on Dec 07, 2017 3:00 PM EST at:

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/2858751509657713153

The Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal Home Ownership (HEARTH) Act was enacted by Congress in 2012 and provides tribal nations the flexibility to manage their own leases on tribal trust lands. In order to exercise this leasing authority, Tribes must first develop their own leasing regulations, consistent with Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) regulations at 25 C.F.R. Part 162, and have them approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Once the leasing regulations have been approved, the Tribe is able to negotiate and enter into leases of tribal trust land without further BIA approval.

Presenters:

  • Cynthia Morales, Trust Services Director, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
  • Matthew Carriaga, Realty Director, Ho-Chunk Nation
  • Jody Cummings, Partner, Steptoe & Johnson
  • Moderator – Jacob Schellinger, NCAI Staff Attorney & Legislative Counsel

This informative webinar will discuss tribal leasing and self-governance under the HEARTH Act.

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

Chilkat Indian Village Suit over Mining Affecting Chilkat River [updated]

Here is the complaint in Chilkat Indian Village v. Bureau of Land Management (D. Alaska):

1 Complaint

43 Chilkat MSJ

57 Intervenor Opposition

58 Federal Opposition

59 Reply

61 DCT Order

Five Tribes Complaint against Trump over Bears Ears

Here is the complaint in Hopi Tribe et al. v. Trump (D.D.C.):

Doc. 1 Complaint

Update on the parallel suit involving Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: Wilderness Society v. Trump is here