Here is the complaint in Utah Diné Bikéyah v. Trump (D.D.C.):
2017.12.06 – Bears Ears Complaint (filed)
Here is the complaint in Natural Resources Defense Council v. Trump (D.D.C.):
Here is the complaint in Utah Diné Bikéyah v. Trump (D.D.C.):
2017.12.06 – Bears Ears Complaint (filed)
Here is the complaint in Natural Resources Defense Council v. Trump (D.D.C.):
Here is the complaint in St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. McKesson Corp. (W.D. Wis.):
Here are selected papers available online:
We’ve been getting a number of questions about this compact, likely due to the level and type of press coverage about it in Alaska (see here). We’ve hesitated to post on it, given all the people who know it much better than we do, but it’s important to see what this compact does and doesn’t do.
The compact is HERE (now as a searchable PDF because that’s how we do things).
The compact is, without question, a big step forward for the state of Alaska. It is the result of a lot of hard work of a lot of tribes, and opens doors that Alaska has long kept closed to tribes. There is recognition of tribal court protection and child support orders, as well as ensuring a child’s eligibility for federal funding regardless of tribal or state custody. The compact (Sec. 6.2.1) allows for the sharing of confidential information, and access to databases. This section alone are of particular importance and relevant for all tribes facing state intransigence on confidentiality and child welfare.
The compact is not the final step, however. The document provides an agreed upon framework for future negotiations between the state and individual tribes or tribal consortiums. The compact allows the state (OCS) to shift responsibility for providing services–and importantly, the related state funding–to tribal social services departments. But the compact does not address tribal jurisdiction, transfer to tribal court, or assume that if a tribal department takes over services that the tribe will take jurisdiction. Therefore, the compact doesn’t address tribal courts at all, or if state funding follows a child in to tribal court (spoiler alert: right now it doesn’t).
There are a lot of tribes in Alaska increasing their tribal court capacity right now, and it does seem the next step would be for tribes to exercise jurisdiction over their children without losing the funding due to those children as state citizens. It will also be interesting to see the individual tribal/tribal consortium compacts that address the details of how the services will be divided between the state and tribe.




Nick Reo, Kyle Whyte, and others have posted “Seven Indigenous principles for successful cooperation in Great Lakes conservation initiatives.”
Here are the amici curiae in the matter of Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe et al:
For Movants:
In Opposition:
Link: Case archive
Please register for Tribal Leasing and Self-Governance Under the HEARTH Act on Dec 07, 2017 3:00 PM EST at:
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/2858751509657713153
The Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal Home Ownership (HEARTH) Act was enacted by Congress in 2012 and provides tribal nations the flexibility to manage their own leases on tribal trust lands. In order to exercise this leasing authority, Tribes must first develop their own leasing regulations, consistent with Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) regulations at 25 C.F.R. Part 162, and have them approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Once the leasing regulations have been approved, the Tribe is able to negotiate and enter into leases of tribal trust land without further BIA approval.
Presenters:
This informative webinar will discuss tribal leasing and self-governance under the HEARTH Act.
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
Here is the complaint in Chilkat Indian Village v. Bureau of Land Management (D. Alaska):
Here is the complaint in Hopi Tribe et al. v. Trump (D.D.C.):
Update on the parallel suit involving Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: Wilderness Society v. Trump is here
You must be logged in to post a comment.