Here is the complaint in Kialegee Tribal Town v. Dellinger (N.D. Okla.):
“Tribal Leaders Outraged over Zinke’s Effort to Eliminate Protections for Bears Ears National Monument”
Updated Bears Ears Coverage
WaPo: “Interior secretary recommends Trump alter at least three national monuments, including Bears Ears”
Here.
What Did Zinke Just Do on National Monuments? Besides Passive Aggressively Demean Bears Ears Supporters, I Mean. (Now with “Rock Licker” Update)
Here is the press release that omits any actual recommendations. Here is the report summary that also says nothing.
But this excerpt asks us readers to assume that comments by supporters of national monuments should be ignored because they are merely statements “orchestrated” by “national . . . organizations”:
Comments received were overwhelmingly in favor of maintaining existing monuments and demonstrated a well orchestrated national campaign organized by multiple organizations.
Update: news coverage from earlier today quoting a Utah politician attacking national monument supporters as “rock lickers” — an excerpt:
Mike Noel, a Utah state representative, said that reducing or eliminating Bears Ears would be “a victory for our state.” Federal management of land in his state had constrained drilling, mining and grazing, he said, adding that Washington had no business setting aside so much land for the strict protection that monument status affords.
“When you turn the management over to the tree-huggers, the bird and bunny lovers and the rock lickers, you turn your heritage over,” Mr. Noel said.
American Indian Law Center — Pre-Law Summer Institute 50th Anniversary Conference and Dinner

Pre-Law Summer Institute 50th Anniversary Celebration and CLE, September 28-29, 2017 (registration closes September 14)
Evolution of Indian Law CLE Conference Agenda
CLE and Dinner Registration, and hotel information
PLSI Alumni Website
Press release(PDF):
State of Arizona/Tucson Unified School District Attack on Mexican Studies Program Violated the Fourteenth Amendment
National Intertribal Tax Alliance Conference (Sept. 12-14, 2017)
Here.
Federal Court Dismisses as Moot Lumbee Member Challenge to BIA Indian Preference Interpretation
Here are the materials in Nakai v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
AFCARS Model Comments for Tribes
I posted earlier about the AFCARS proposed information collection activity posted in June.
Here is the Federal Register page.
There are at least sets of two model comments for tribes in circulation. If you have not yet received any but would like them, please feel free to contact me (fort@law.msu.edu) or Delia Sharpe at California Tribal Families Coalition (delia.sharpe@caltribalfamilies.org). These need to be emailed to the feds by August 29.
You must be logged in to post a comment.