Here is the pleading in Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Fleming (D.S.D.):
Petitioner’s Brief in Lewis v. Clarke
Final Review of Washtenaw County’s Peacemaking Court Initiative
Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. Jewell Cert Stage Materials
Cert Petition:
Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. Jewell
Questions presented:
1. Whether, to have been a “recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been “recognized” at that time.2. Whether, to have been “under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been located in Indian country – that is, on land over which the United States exercised jurisdiction to the exclusion of State jurisdiction.
Nisenan Tribe of the Nevada City Rancheria v. Jewell Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ nunc pro tunc ruling depriving Petitioners of substantive procedural rights was in error?2. Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling on the statute of limitations was in error?
Fletcher Preview of Lewis v. Clarke
Here is “Supreme Court case could expose Indian tribes to new legal risks” at The Conversation.
Excerpt:
One would be tempted to think this is a case about fairness, about guaranteeing a forum for non-Indians to sue tribal employees who might be cloaked in a tribe’s immunity from the suit. In my opinion, fairness to the Lewis couple, however, comes at the expense of fairness to the tribe.
Recall that the tribe does provide a forum to resolve personal injury claims against it in tribal court, but with a one year limitations period. Under that law, the Mohegan tribal court has confirmed awards against tribal police officers; indeed, the tribe likely has settled thousands of claims over the years.
I have long argued that Indian tribes should provide an adequate forum to address the negligent actions of their employees. The Mohegan tribe has done so here by establishing a tribal court and a legal process for resolving personal injury claims. In fact, Mohegan was one of the earliest tribes to start doing so, way back in the 1990s. But personal injury lawyers have complained about Mohegan law because it bars punitive damages and other doctrines that can balloon judgment awards.
***
Background materials on the case are here.
Staff Attorney Position with Forest County Potawatomi
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
IN-HOUSE STAFF ATTORNEY, LEGAL DEPARTMENT
MILWAUKEE LOCATION
The Forest County Potawatomi Community is seeking a qualified in-house staff attorney to provide legal advice and representation to a diverse client base. A minimum of five years of experience is required. Candidates must possess a valid license to practice law in the State of Wisconsin or be willing to obtain such a license within a reasonable time. The position offers challenging work, competitive compensation and benefits. Areas of practice include: Employment, Health, and/or General Corporate. A general knowledge of Indian Communities and Indian Law is preferred but not required.
If you are interested in applying for this position, please send your resume, cover letter and salary requirements to: fcpcmw@gmail.com
Troy Eid Serving on Trump Transition Team
Seminole Tribe Prevails in Dispute with Florida over Banked Games
Here are the materials in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida (N.D. Fla.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.