Here.
KTOO: “Coin commemorating Alaska Native civil rights leader Elizabeth Peratrovich released”
Here.
Here.
Materials here.
Update — footnote 2 of the majority:
As noted earlier, the Ninth Circuit has held in three cases—the so called Katie John trilogy—that the term “public lands,” when used in ANILCA’s subsistence-fishing provisions, encompasses navigable waters like the Nation River. See Alaska v. Babbitt, 72 F. 3d 698 (1995); John v. United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. United States, 720 F. 3d 1214 (2013); supra, at 12. Those provisions are not at issue in this case, and we therefore do not disturb the Ninth Circuit’s holdings that the Park Service may regulate subsistence fishing on navigable waters. See generally Brief for State of Alaska as Amicus Curiae 29–35 (arguing that this case does not implicate those decisions); Brief for Ahtna, Inc., as Amicus Curiae 30–36 (same).
Here.
Merits Briefs:
National Parks Conservation Association Amicus Brief
Alaska Native Subsistence Users Amicus Brief
Cert Stage Briefs:
Alaska Amicus Brief in Support of Cert Petition
Federal Brief in Opposition to Cert
Lower court materials:
Opinion in Sturgeon v. Masica.
Mentasta Traditional Village et al Brief
Materials in Sturgeon v. Frost I:
Here: “In Alaskan nursing homes and hospitals, tight federal regulations have meant that the most comforting foods for natives have been labeled illegal. That’s slowly changing.”
Here is the opinion in Sturgeon v. Masica. An excerpt:
John Sturgeon would like to use his hovercraft in a national preserve to reach moose hunting grounds. The State of Alaska is fine with that; the federal government is not. Sturgeon’s case turns on which entity—state or federal—gets to decide the matter. On remand from the Supreme Court, we again conclude that the federal government properly exercised its authority to regulate hovercraft use on the rivers within conservation system units in Alaska.
Briefs:
Here, from Project Earth.
The agreement allows for law enforcement officers in Alaska to refer certain misdemeanor crimes and offenses to participating tribal courts for restorative justice sentencing. It’s the first of its kind agreement in Alaska and the Anvik tribe located in Anvik, AK became the first tribe to enter into this agreement with the State. Please let me know if you would like additional information. Thanks!
The following link is to an article in the local Fairbanks, AK newspaper regarding the Civil Diversion Agreement.
The following link is to the Civil Diversion Agreement itself on the State of Alaska’s website.
http://law.alaska.gov/pdf/press/170110-CivilDiversionAgreement.pdf
Here is “Alaska Is Failing Its Indigenous Students” by Evon Parker.
You must be logged in to post a comment.