No Casino in Plymouth v. NIGC Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

  1. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it dismissed plaintiffs’ challenge to DOI’s approval of a trust transfer for the Ione Band which was not a recognized tribe in 1934 as required by the IRA?
  2. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it dismissed plaintiffs’ challenge to NIGC’s authority to approve a gaming ordinance for the Ione Band which has no Indian lands as defined by IGRA?
  3. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it dismissed plaintiffs’ claim that federal acknowledgement as a tribe under 25 CFR Part 83 is a prerequisite for the Ione Band to receive IRA and IGRA benefits?

Lower court materials here.

West Flagler v. Haaland Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

1. Whether IGRA authorizes the approval of a compact that purports to allow for an online sports gambling monopoly throughout the state and off Indian lands.

2. Whether an IGRA compact violates the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act if it provides for internet sports betting that is unlawful where many of the bets are placed.

3. Whether the Secretary’s approval of a tribalstate compact violates equal protection principles where it provides a specific tribe with a monopoly on online sports gaming off tribal lands, while state law makes that conduct a felony for everyone else.

Lower court materials here.

Littlefield v. DOI Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

Whether the decision of the court of appeals conflicts with Carcieri?

Lower court materials here.

SCOTUS Denies Cert in McCarren Act Issue re: Klamath River

Here is today’s order list.

The petition in Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation is here.

The BOR is here.

Reply is here:

Federal Brief in Opposition in Klamath River Matter [McCarren Act]

Here is the brief in Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation (No. 23-216):

Petition is here.

SCOTUS Denies Two Indian Law Cert Petitions

Here is today’s order list.

The two denied petitions are Bird Industries v. Tribal Business Council of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation and Sauk-Suiattle Tribe v. City of Seattle.

Second Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation Cert Petition [McCarren Act Issues]

Here:

Question presented:

Whether the federal government can avoid the doctrine of prior exclusive jurisdiction in an ongoing, comprehensive water adjudication under the McCarran Amendment by asserting defenses based on federal law.

The first petition is here.

Bird v. Three Affiliated Cert Petition [sovereign immunity]

Here is the petition in Bird v. Tribal Business Council of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation:

Question presented:

Does inclusion of a mandatory arbitration clause in an Agreement with an Indian Tribe waive the Tribe’s sovereign immunity?

Eighth Circuit materials:

District court materials here.

Sauk-Suiattle v. Seattle Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

  1. Is the court-created “futility” doctrine, which allows a United States court to decide a case removed from state court even though it lacks jurisdiction, repugnant to Article III of the Constitution?
  2. Does application of the so-called “futility” doctrine by a United States court to decide a case over which it lacks jurisdiction contravene 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), the plain language of which requires remand of the cause to the state court from which it was removed?
  3. Should the Supreme Court grant certiorari to reconcile a conflict among the circuit courts of appeal regarding the validity of the futility doctrine?

Lower court materials here.

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Challenge to Spokane Tribe Water Agreement

Here is today’s order list.

The denied petition is Sulgrove v. Spokane Indian Tribe.

Lower court materials here.

This has nothing to do with this case.