Federal Court Dismisses Tort Claim against Crow Health Care Center

Here are the materials in Wilhite v. Awe Kualawaache Care Center (D. Mont.):

29 Motion to Dismiss – sovereign immunity

30 Response

33 Reply

35 Motion to Dismiss – FTCA

38 Response

39 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Holds Nonmember Exhausted Tribal Remedies when Tribal Appellate Court Decided Jurisdiction Issues, but Not Merits

Here are the materials in Big Horn County Elec. Coop. v. Big Man (D. Mont.):

1 Complaint

1-4 Absolooke Appeals Court Opinion Part 1

1-5 Absolooke Appeals Court Opinion Part 2

1-7 Crow Tribal Court Opinion

1-9 Motion for Summary Judgment

1-10 Defendant Opposition

1-11 Appellant Brief

1-12 Appellee Brief

32 Big Man Motion to Dismiss

34 Tribal Motion to Dismiss

39 Response

44 Big Man Reply

45 Tribal Reply

48 Magistrate Report

50 Big Horn Objections

53 Big Man Response

54 Tribal Response

55 DCT Order Rejecting Magistrate Report

Tribes Sue over Keystone XL Pipeline

Here:

ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE AND FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY FILE SUIT AGAINST KEYSTONE XL

The Rosebud Sioux Tribe (Sicangu Lakota Oyate) and the Fort Belknap Indian Community (Assiniboine (Nakoda) and Gros Ventre (Aaniiih) Tribes) in coordination with their counsel, the Native American Rights Fund, on September 10, 2018, sued the Trump Administration in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, Great Falls Division, for numerous violations of the law in the Keystone XL pipeline permitting process. The Tribes are asking the court to declare the review process in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and to rescind the illegal issuance of the Keystone XL pipeline presidential permit.

On March 23, 2017, the U.S. Department of State granted TransCanada’s permit application and issued it a presidential permit to construct and operate the Keystone XL Pipeline. This decision reversed two previous administrative decisions and was done without any public comment or environmental analysis. The permitting process was completed only 56 days after TransCanada submitted its application for the third time. The State Department provided no explanation in the 2017 decision for its contradictory factual finding; instead, it simply disregarded its previous factual findings and replaced them with a new one. The reversal came as no surprise. According to a 2015 personal public financial disclosure report filed with the Federal Election Commission, then-candidate Trump held between $250,000 and $500,000 worth of stock in TransCanada Pipelines,Trump permitted the Keystone XL pipeline because he wanted to. It was a political step, having nothing to do with what the law actually requires. NARF is honored to represent the Rosebud Sioux and Fort Belknap Tribes to fully enforce the laws and fight this illegal pipeline.”

Snaking its way from Alberta to Nebraska, the pipeline would cross the United States-Canada border in Philips County, Montana, directly adjacent to Blaine County and the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation. The pipeline would cross less than 100 miles from the headquarters of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation and run directly through sacred and historic sites as well as the ancestral lands of the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes. In South Dakota, the pipeline would cross through Tripp County, just miles from the boundaries of the Rosebud Indian Reservation and within yards of Rosebud’s trust lands and tribal members’ allotments. These lands are well within the area of impact for even a small rupture and spill. There are countless historical, cultural, and religious sites in the planned path of the pipeline that are at risk of destruction, both by the pipeline’s construction and by the threat of inevitable ruptures and spills if the pipeline becomes operational. Additionally, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe operates its own water delivery system, which is part of the Mni Wiconi Rural Water Supply Project. The pipeline would cross the two sources of water for the Mni Wiconi Project.

Despite all of these facts, throughout the permitting process, there was no analysis of trust obligations, no analysis of treaty rights, no analysis of the potential impact on hunting and fishing rights, no analysis of potential impacts on the Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s unique water system, no analysis of the potential impact of spills on tribal citizens, and no analysis of the potential impact on cultural sites in the path of the pipeline, which is in violation of the NEPA and the NHPA.

William Kindle, who was president of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe in August 2018 when the Tribal Council authorized NARF to finalize and file this lawsuit, stated at that time that, “As President of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, I want to make it perfectly clear, and give fair warning to President Trump, Secretary Zinke, The United States Army Corps of Engineers, TransCanada and their financial backers and potential investors, South Dakota Governor Daugaard, Representative Noem, and Senators Thune and Rounds that the Rosebud Sioux Tribe opposes the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. Through our attorneys—the Native American Rights Fund—the Rosebud Sioux Tribe will use all means available to fight in the courtroom this blatant trespass into Sicangu Lakota territory.”

Find out more about the Keystone XL Pipeline and the tribes’ opposition.

Federal Court Issues TRO in Grizzly Bear Delisting Case

Here are the materials in Crow Indian Tribe v. Dept. of Interior (D. Mont.):

251 Motion for TRO

252 Organizational Plaintiffs Motion for TRO

253 Brief in Support

254 DCT Order Granting TRO

Prior posts here.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment in NEPA Challenge to Secretarial Order 3348 [includes Northern Cheyenne Tribe]

Here is the pleading in Citizens for Clean Energy v. Dept. of Interior (D. Mont.):

100 Motion for Summary J

Here is the order on the Federal Coal Memorandum.

Federal Court Dismisses Title VII Complaint against Salish Kootenai College

Here are the materials in McCoy v. Salish Kootenai College Inc. (D. Mont.):

13 Motion to Dismiss

22 Response to 13

25 Reply in Support of 13

28 CSKT Amicus Brief

33 American Indian Higher Education Consortium Amicus

37 DCT Order

Federal Court Allows CFPB Suit to Proceed against Think Finance

Here are the materials in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Think Finance (D. Mont.):

51 Motion to Dismiss

59 Response

61 Reply

65 NFOA & Oklahoma Amicus Brief

78 DCT Order

Federal Court Allows Civil RICO Suit to Proceed against Crow Nation-Owned Health Facility

Here are the materials in Wilhite v. Awe Kualawaache Care Center (D. Mont.):

13 Motion to Dismiss

15 Response

17 Reply

18 DCT Order

Federal Court Holds Federal Claims Act Suits against Section 17 Corporations are Suits against the Tribal Owner

Here are the materials in Cain v. Salish Kootenai College (D. Mont.):

90 CSKT Amicus Brief

92 SKC Motion to Dismiss

102 Cain Response

106 Reply

108 DCT Order

This case is on remand from the CA9.

Federal Court Rejects Trappers/Hunters Effort to Dismiss Challenge to Federal Implementation of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Rule 19!)

Here are the materials in Wildearth Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service (D. Mont.):

75 Motion to Dismiss

79 Federal Response

80 Wildearth Guardians Response

84 Reply

94 DCT Order