Here are the materials in Wilhite v. Awe Kualawaache Care Center (D. Mont.):
District of Montana
Federal Court Holds Federal Claims Act Suits against Section 17 Corporations are Suits against the Tribal Owner
Here are the materials in Cain v. Salish Kootenai College (D. Mont.):
This case is on remand from the CA9.
Federal Court Rejects Trappers/Hunters Effort to Dismiss Challenge to Federal Implementation of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Rule 19!)
Here are the materials in Wildearth Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service (D. Mont.):
Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Tribal Court Marriage Dissolution Proceeding [UPDATED]
Here are the materials in LaForge v. Gets Down (D. Mont.):
21 Tribal Judges Motion to Dismiss
Update [6/26/2018]
Indigenous Environmental Network’s Suit Against Keystone XL Will Proceed
Here is the order in the matter of Indigenous Environmental Network v. U.S. Dep’t of State, No. 4:17-cv-00029-BMM (D. Mont.):
Link: Previous posts
Crow Indian Tribe Sues to Keep Yellowstone Grizzlies on Threatened Species List
Here are the documents and materials in the matter of Crow Indian Tribe et al v. U.S.A. et al, 17-cv-00089 (D. Mont. 2017):
- Doc. 22 – First Amended Complaint and Petition for Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Relief
- Doc. 23 – Federal Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Petition for Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Relief
- Doc. 27 – State of Wyoming’s Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene
- Doc. 28 – Order on State of Wyoming’s Motion for Leave to Intervene
Federal Court Dismisses Effort to Overturn Fort Peck Appellate Court Probate Decision
Here are the materials in White Eagle-Payne v. Bemer (D. Mont.):
Federal Court Denies Application by Non-Lawyer Tribal Bar Assn. Members for Admission to Practice
Here are the materials in O’Neil v. Gilman (D. Mont.):
Tribal Suit against Interior over Yellowstone Grizzly Delisting
Here is the complaint in Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Dept. of Interior (D. Mont.):
Federal Court Affirms Some 638 Contract Denials re: Northern Arapaho Tribe, Remands Others
Here are the materials in Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Lacounte (D. Mont.):
131 NAT Motion for Summary Judgment
An excerpt:
The Court affirms the BIA’s declinations of NAT’s second and third judicial services proposals, wildlife resources management proposal, and water resources management proposal. The Court reverses the BIA’s declination of NAT’s youth court proposal, to the extent that the declination improperly relied upon post-hoc justifications, and NAT’s first judicial services proposal. We remand these proposals to the BIA for reconsideration.
Prior posts here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.