Wasson v. Pyramid Lake — ICRA Claims Dismissed

Here is the opinion: DCT Dismisses Wasson Complaint.

Our prior post on this case is here.

Wasson v. Pyramid Lake Tribe: ICRA etc. Challenge to Tribal Government

Here are the materials:

Tribal Motion to Dismiss

DCT Order Denying Wasson Motion for Injunction

Elk Valley Rancheria Wins Contract Claims against Gaming Management Company

Here are the materials in Elk Valley Rancheria v. Ellis (D. Nev.):

DCT Order Granting Summary Judgment to Elk Valley

Elk Valley Motion for Summary Judgment

Ellis Opposition

Elk Valley Reply

Challenge to NIGC Rulemaking Authority Ongoing

Here are current materials in Crosby Lodge v. NIGC (D. Nev.), a challenge to NIGC authority to require that 60 percent of on-reservation gaming revenues of non-Indian gaming entities go to tribes (25 CFR 522.10(c)):

Crosby Lodge Motion for Summary Judgment

NIGC Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

Earlier materials here.

District Court Finds “Colorable” Tribal Court Jurisdiction in FMLA Claim

Here are the materials in Paddy v. Mulkey (D. Nev.):

DCT Order to Show Cause

Plaintiff Brief Opposing Tribal Court Jurisdiction

Defendants Brief Favoring Tribal Court Jurisdiction

Plaintiff Reply Brief

Paddy v. Mulkey DCT Order

Boney v. Valline — Suit re: Police Liability under Self-Determination Act & FTCA

Here is the opinion in this case — boney-v-valline-dct-order — where the District of Nevada held that a tribal officer who employed deadly force was enforcing tribal law, and so could not be liable under the FTCA or the Self-Determination Act.

Here are the materials:

boney-first-amended-complaint

valline-motion-for-summary-judgment

boney-opposition-to-motion

valline-reply-brief

Cortez Hills Gold Project Materials

The District of Nevada denied the motion for an injunction (news article here, via Indianz). The motion by the South Fork Band is here — south-fork-motion-for-tro

Crosby Lodge v. NIGC — Facial Challenge to 25 CFR 522.10(c) Rejected

Crosby Lodge is licensed by Paiute Lake Indian tribe to conduct Class III gaming. Under the regulation, they owe at least 60 percent of revenues to the tribe. The company challenged the reg, and lost.

nigc-motion-for-summary-judgment

crosby-lodge-opposition

nigc-reply-brief

crosby-lodge-v-nigc-dct-opinion

Fortunet v. Arizona Gametech Corp. — Class II Pull-Tabs Determination

This case has some discussion of Class II gaming/pull tabs in the context of an alleged Lanham Act violation.

fortunet-v-gametech-arizona-corp

Dyer v. BIA — Tribal Sovereign Immunity Case

In this case, decided by the District of Nevada, involved a leasing decision by the Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribe. The plaintiff, a tribal member who had lost his lease to land from the tribe, sued the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the tribe. The case was dismissed at the motion of the tribe, which had not waived immunity.

dyer-v-bia-dct-order