Here is the opinion: DCT Dismisses Wasson Complaint.
Our prior post on this case is here.
Here is the opinion: DCT Dismisses Wasson Complaint.
Our prior post on this case is here.
Here are the materials in Elk Valley Rancheria v. Ellis (D. Nev.):
DCT Order Granting Summary Judgment to Elk Valley
Here are current materials in Crosby Lodge v. NIGC (D. Nev.), a challenge to NIGC authority to require that 60 percent of on-reservation gaming revenues of non-Indian gaming entities go to tribes (25 CFR 522.10(c)):
Crosby Lodge Motion for Summary Judgment
NIGC Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
Earlier materials here.
Here are the materials in Paddy v. Mulkey (D. Nev.):
Plaintiff Brief Opposing Tribal Court Jurisdiction
Here is the opinion in this case — boney-v-valline-dct-order — where the District of Nevada held that a tribal officer who employed deadly force was enforcing tribal law, and so could not be liable under the FTCA or the Self-Determination Act.
Here are the materials:
The District of Nevada denied the motion for an injunction (news article here, via Indianz). The motion by the South Fork Band is here — south-fork-motion-for-tro
Crosby Lodge is licensed by Paiute Lake Indian tribe to conduct Class III gaming. Under the regulation, they owe at least 60 percent of revenues to the tribe. The company challenged the reg, and lost.
This case has some discussion of Class II gaming/pull tabs in the context of an alleged Lanham Act violation.
In this case, decided by the District of Nevada, involved a leasing decision by the Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribe. The plaintiff, a tribal member who had lost his lease to land from the tribe, sued the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the tribe. The case was dismissed at the motion of the tribe, which had not waived immunity.