Additional materials here:
23 Motion for Stay and to Compel Arbitration
31 Opposition to Motion for Stay
33 Reply in Support of Motion for Stay
Here are the new materials in Federal Trade Commission v. Payday Financial LLC (D. S.D.):
117 DCT Order Denying PF Motion for Summary J
120 FTC Memorandum of Supplemental Authority
131 DCT Order Granting Partial Summary J to FTC
Materials from the complaint here.
News coverage here. South Dakota will provide an in-person absentee voting station in Shannon County (Pine Ridge Reservation) for the same number of days as all other areas — 46 days as required under state law — compared to the six days provided to Pine Ridge. South Dakota, after the conclusion of the case, asked for costs; Judge Schreier denied that motion.
Here are the materials in Brooks v. Gant (D. S.D.):
159 DCT Order Dismissing Complaint wo Prejudice
161 South Dakota Bill of Costs
163 DCT Order Denying Bill of Costs
An excerpt from docket number 163:
Under the facts of this case, it would be unjust to require plaintiffs to pay defendants’ costs. Defendants refused to provide plaintiffs with the relief they requested until this lawsuit was filed. It was only when defendants faced actual litigation that defendants were able to work cooperatively with each other to provide the relief sought by plaintiffs. Additionally, plaintiffs stood to gain nothing personally from this Voting Rights Act litigation. The action was brought by individual plaintiffs, all of whom are persons without great means, to vindicate the voting right of all Native Americans who live on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Defendants on the other hand, who are being represented by the South Dakota Public Assurance Alliance, have the wherewithal to afford to pay their share of the costs associated with this litigation. Had defendants voluntarily agreed to provide the relief requested by plaintiffs when approached before the litigation was filed, they could have avoided the costs they are now seeking.
Here are the materials in LeBeau v. United States (D. S.D.):
32 DCT Order Dismissing Complaint
An excerpt:
Plaintiffs brought suit against the United States alleging claims for breach of trust obligations, breach of fiduciary duty, and accounting. The relief sought by plaintiffs is limited to declaratory and equitable relief. The United States moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety, arguing plaintiffs lack standing, among other things. Plaintiffs resist the motion. For the following reasons, the motion is granted, and plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed without prejudice.
Here is the motion in Heldt v. Payday Financial LLC (D. S.D.):
Complaint here.
Here are the new materials in Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber (D. S.D.):
Here are the indictments of Ted Nelson, Steve Nelson, and Jerome Adrian for tax evasion. All claimed to be members of the fake “Pembina National Little Shell Band of North America.”
News coverage here. Arrested via predator drone…..
Here is the complaint in Heldt v. Payday Financial LLC (D. S.D.):
News coverage here.
Here are the briefs in Columbe v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe:
Lower court materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.