Here is the motion in the case captioned County of Charles Mix v. DOI (D. S.D.): Interior Motion to Dismiss Charles Mix County Complaint
And here is the response: Charles Mix County Opposition Brief
Here is the complaint, a challenge to the government’s trust acquisition of land for the Yankton Sioux Tribe on which a travel plaza is located.
Here are the materials in this case that details the interaction of tribal (Rosebud Sioux, in this case) and federal criminal procedure rules, holding that FRCrimPro 41 is inapplicable to tribal law enforcement officers when investigating alleged violations of tribal criminal law.
Here are the materials in Sprint Communications v. Native American Telecom (D. S.D.):
Sprint Opposition to Motion for Stay
NAT Reply in Support of Motion to Stay
NAT Opposition to Motion for PI
Sprint Reply in Support of Motion for PI
An excerpt:
Indianz reported on this earlier today here.
Here are the materials so far in Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota (D. S.D.):
Here are the materials in United States v. Lesmeister (D. S.D.):
Here is the complaint in County of Charles Mix v. U.S. Dept. of Interior (D. S.D.): Charles Mix County v. DOI Complaint
Here are the materials in Alltel v. Oglala Sioux Tribe (D. S.D.):
Here are the available materials in Chipps v. Oglala Sioux Tribal Court (D. S.D.):
Here are the materials in Dreaming Bear v. Fleming (D. S.D.) (news article here via Pechanga):
DCT Order Denying Dreaming Bear Motion for Injunction
Here are the most recent materials (the government’s motion to dismiss and earlier materials are here):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.