Here is the opinion in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Dept. of the Interior.
Briefs here.

Here is the unpublished opinion in Western Watersheds Project v. McCullough. And same for the Bartell Ranch/Burns Paiute case.
Selected briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the new materials in Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCullough (D. Nev.):
117 DCT Order Denying Reconsideration

Here are the materials in Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCullough (D. Nev.):
45 Atsa Koodakuh Wyh Nuwu People of Red Mountain Motion for PI
From one of the authors of the original paper:
It is true that there have been a number of proclamations diminishing monuments in the past but none of these have been challenged in court so no court has ever passed on the legality of these actions. Moreover, all of these actions were pre-FLPMA, which matters significantly here because FLPMA repealed the Midwest Oil decision. A 1935 Solicitor’s Opinion relied heavily on Midwest Oil to justify proclamations that diminished monuments. Post FLPMA, that justification is gone.
Original post here.
House Resources staff response.
Here are the opening briefs in National Mining Assn. v. Jewell:
16 – Open Brief – no Addendum (Quaterra)
18 – Open Brief & Addendum (NMA)
29 – Utah, AZ, NV, MT – Amicus in Favor of Reversal
Here are the materials in Grand Canyon Trust v. Williams (D. Ariz.):
140-1 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary J
147-1 Intervenors Motion for Summary J
An excerpt:
This case arises out of the proposed renewal of operations at the Canyon Mine in Northern Arizona. The Canyon Mine is a breccia pipe uranium mine located six miles south of Grand Canyon National Park, in the Kaibab National Forest, and four miles north of Red Butte, a culturally and religiously significant site for the Havasupai and other tribes.
Here is the order in Yount v. Jewell (D. Ariz.):
Here is the order in Yount v. Jewell (D. Ariz.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.