Here are the materials in Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi Inc. (N.D. Cal.):
California Federal Court Rejects Effort to Enjoin Kalshi/Robinhood “Event Contracts” Gambling
IGRA
New Mexico Federal Court [Browning, J.] Holds State Courts Do Not Possess Jurisdiction over Tort Claims Brought against Tribal Gaming but Federal Courts Have No Jurisdiction to Do Anything About It
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. Biedsheid (D.N.M.):
Cert Petition in Oklahoma Gaming Machines Tax Case
Here is the petition in Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections v. Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.:
20200514142407520_Petition for Writ of Certiorari
20200514142428474_Appendix for Petition for Writ of Certiorari
Question presented:
Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test, see White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980), where the tax does not infringe on any federal regulatory purpose contained in the IGRA, the tax does not interfere with any tribal sovereignty interests, and the tax supports relevant and important government interests, such as law enforcement, schools and health services.
Lower court decision here.
UPDATE:
Oklahoma SCT Holds Tax on Video Game Machines Used at Cherokee Casinos is Preempted by Federal Law
SCOTUS Denies Cert in Four Indian Law Matters (Miccosukee + Jim, ICWA, and Comanche)
SCOTUS Denies Cert in McNeal v. Navajo [formerly Dalley v. Navajo]
Here is today’s order list.
Cert stage and other materials in McNeal are here.
Koi Nation v. U.S. Dept. of Interior [Restored Lands Exception]
Miccosukee Per Cap Taxation Cert Petitions
Here is the petition in Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States:
Question presented:
The 2014 Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act states that, for income tax purposes, “[g]ross income does not include the value of any Indian general welfare benefit.”
The question presented is whether contrary to that plain command, gross income includes “Indian general welfare benefits” when those benefits are derived from gaming revenue pursuant to the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
Here is the petition in Jim v. United States:
Questions presented:
Whether treaties with Indian tribes must be construed consistent with that tribe’s present-sense understanding of the treaty.
Whether the Miccosukee Tribe’s long-standing method of compensation for use of Tribal member lands and distributing revenue from land to its members can be considered a “mere formalism” to avoid inclusion and taxation as income to the members when the Tribe’s chosen method of compensation is soundly in line with federal law and policy.
Whether the Assistant Secretary of the Interior through its designated representative can interpret, waive, modify or exempt payments made to tribal members from inclusion as income.
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE:
McNeal v. Navajo Nation Cert Petition
Here:
Question presented:
Whether the Tenth Circuit panel violated the current jurisprudence of this Court and the Congressional policy underlying IGRA by precluding the Nation from exercising its sovereign authority to permit a patron’s tort claim against the Nation and its gaming facility to be brought in state court without express congressional permission.
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE (3/14/19):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.