Here is the opinion in Gila River Indian Community v. Schoubroek.
Here are available briefs:
Lower court materials here.

Here is the opinion in Gila River Indian Community v. Schoubroek.
Here are available briefs:
Lower court materials here.


Here are the materials in Gila River Indian Community v. Schoebroek (D. Ariz.):
87 Schoebroek MSJ Claim Preclusion
89 Schoebroek MSJ on Jurisdiction
101 Gila River Opposition to 87
103 Gila River Opposition to 89
111 Schoebroek MTD San Carlos Complaint
112 San Carlos Apache Complaint in Intervention
116 Tribes Motion for Sanctions
Prior post here.
Here:
Question presented:
Does the federal government possess final decision-making authority over the management of water rights held in trust for an Indian tribe?
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE:
Here.
Here are the materials so far in Gila River Indian Community v. Cranford (D. Ariz.):
Here is the petition in Bales v. United States:
Question presented:
Whether, against the legal backdrop of Congress’s and this Court’s recognition of the primacy of state law to determine, quantify, and administer water rights, a federal court may deem federal agency regulatory action under the Endangered Species Act to constitute the adjudication and administration of water rights for tribal purposes.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Here are the materials in Hawkins v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Here.
Report here (chapter on Navajo).
You must be logged in to post a comment.