Here:
Panel materials are here.
Here are additional materials relating to a motion for clarification by the county:
Panel decision materials here.
Here is the indictment in United States v. Sheffler (W.D. Mo.):
News coverage here.
Here is the opinion.
The court’s summary:
In an appeal from Ada County, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court that the State of Idaho can regulate the importation of cigarettes onto reservations located in Idaho and that the State has personal jurisdiction over non-resident defendant Native Wholesale Supply Company. The Supreme Court reversed the district court’s decision that Native Wholesale Supply Company is required to obtain a wholesaler permit for its sales to a tribal-owned retailer on the Coeur d’Alene reservation.
News coverage here.
Here:
Matheson v Washington Cert Petition
Questions presented:
1. Did the state courts below err in entering a state excise tax and penalty judgment against a tribal Indian who is exempt from state taxes and who also had a state tobacco license to transport cigarettes free of state tax stamps?
2. Is a tribal Indian, whose only activity was to transport cargo in round trips to Indian reservations, exempt from state taxes under the Indian and interstate commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution?
For the life of me, I can’t find the Washington Court of Appeals materials in this matter. Weird….
Here is the opinion.
The court’s summary:
Reversing the district court’s summary judgment, the panel held that state and local governments lack the power to tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian tribe pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 465.
The panel held that pursuant to Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145 (1973), the exemption of trust lands from state and local taxation under § 465 extends to permanent improvements on such lands. The panel concluded that the fact that the improvements were owned by a limited liability company, rather than by the tribe itself, was irrelevant, as was the question whether the improvements constituted personal property under state law.
Briefs here.
Oral argument audio here.
Judicial notice materials re: new federal leasing regs are here.
Here is the AG opinion.
Here are the materials in Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Gordon v. Holder (opinion link & PDF):
Anti-Smoking Amici in Support of DOJ
Convenience Stores Amici in Support of DOJ
Lower court materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.