Here: Florida Appellant Brief
Opening Brief in Florida v. Seminole Tribe State Court Tax Case
Here: Florida Appellant Brief
Here: Florida Appellant Brief
Here is the opinion in Lanphere v. Wright.
Briefs here.
Here is the opinion in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax Commission.
Briefs are here.
Lower court materials here.
The case is Lanphere v. Wright (CA9, no decision yet), and is a part of Paul Matheson’s ongoing efforts to avoid tribal, state, and federal law (here and here).
Here are the materials in this case:
Here is that order: DCT Order Amending Judgment.
Here is the order: DCT Order Striking Sag Chip Briefs
The remaining materials are here.
Thanks to T.W., here is the opinion (4-3): Cayuga Opinion
Lower court materials are here.
From How Appealing:
“Court: Oneida Indian Nation can ignore tax collector.” Today’s edition of The Post-Standard of Syracuse, New York contains an article that begins, “When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that the Oneida Indian Nation had to pay property taxes, much of Madison and Oneida counties rejoiced. A federal appeals court on Tuesday, however, stripped the counties of the power to actually collect those taxes. A panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that, while the tribe might owe taxes, it can’t be taken to court because it’s sovereign.”
The Oneida Daily Dispatch reports today that “Court rules that Madison and Oneida counties can’t foreclose on Oneida Indian Nation land.”
And The Utica Observer-Dispatch contains an article headlined “US judges: Counties can’t foreclose on Oneidas.”
Here it comes — the case is captioned Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe v. Granholm (E.D. Mich.):
Federal Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
Michigan Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
Federal Response to State Motion for Summary Judgment
Michigan Response to Federal Motion for Summary Judgment
SCIT Response to Federal Motion
Previous posts:
Materials on the Expert Witnesses
Materials on the “Rosebud Sioux” defenses
You must be logged in to post a comment.