Here are the materials in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Director, Portland Area, Indian Health Service:
6-26-17 Nooksack v. IHS (IBIA) Notice of Appeal
6-26-17 Nooksack v. IHS (IBIA) Declaration of Charity Bernard
Here are the materials in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Director, Portland Area, Indian Health Service:
6-26-17 Nooksack v. IHS (IBIA) Notice of Appeal
6-26-17 Nooksack v. IHS (IBIA) Declaration of Charity Bernard
Here are the materials in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Director, Portland Area, Indian Health Service (IBIA):
3-28-17 Nooksack v. IHS (IBIA) Motion of 271 Nooksack Members to Intervene
4-19-17 Nooksack v. IHS (IBIA) Nooksack’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Intervene
Here are the materials in Nooksack Tribe v. Director, Portland Area Office, Indian Health Service:
2-21-17 Nooksack Tribe IBIA Notice of Appeal
1-19-17 Notice of Intent to Rescind from DHHS to Robert Kelly
Here:
cayibia_ap1-14-17-116123107-0001
Press release:
Cayuga Nation Traditional Government Appeals BIA Decision
Agency Violates Own Rules to Interfere in Cayuga Affairs
January 16, 2017 – Seneca Falls, NY—The Cayuga Nation’s traditional government – the Council of Chiefs and Clan Mothers – on Friday appealed the December 15, 2016 Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) decision declaring a group organized by Clint Halftown to be the government of the Cayuga Nation. The decision by BIA Eastern Regional Director Bruce Maytubby would strip the Clan Mothers of their longstanding role in the Nation’s government, a role Clint Halftown has previously supported. It would put in place a mail-in survey process to substitute for the traditional processes by which Haudenosaunee Nations like the Cayuga Nation have always chosen their leaders.
“Far from being a neutral decision-maker, Maytubby prejudged the viability of the campaign of support process and secretly colluded with the Halftown faction while excluding Nation leaders then-recognized by the United States,” the appeal says. “Mr. Maytubby reversed existing federal policy on supporting mail-in surveys as a means of Cayuga governance without providing any evidence whatsoever – much less substantial evidence – to justify such a reversal.”
The appeal highlights secret communications and meetings between Mr. Maytubby and the Halftown group and points out Mr. Maytubby’s own admission that the mail-in survey process would violate federal law on tribal elections.
“This arbitrary and capricious decision and the backroom dealings that preceded it sets dangerous precedent for federal interference in the affairs of sovereign Indigenous Nations,” explained attorney Joseph Heath, who represents the Nation’s traditional leaders, many of whom have been recognized by the BIA and acknowledged as leaders by the Halftown group for more than a decade. “This violates not only Haudenosaunee law but also federal law protecting Indian nations’ right to self-governance, and their right to self-determination under Article 3 of the United Nations’ Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.”
Sachem Samuel George of the Cayuga Nation noted, “Centuries of bad policies by the United States and its Bureau of Indian Affairs have resulted in the challenges our people face today. We have survived genocide, being forced from our lands, having our children taken from us. In recent decades, the United States’ policies have improved in their acknowledgement of the sovereignty of Indigenous Nations, giving us the freedom to create a better future for our people. Maytubby’s decision, on the other hand, is a return to the dark ages of Indian Affairs.”
###
Here are materials in Great American Life Ins. Co. v. U.S. DOI, 16-cv-00699 ( S.D. Ohio):
Doc. 1 – Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, and Other Relief
Interior Board of Indian Appeals Order Affirming Decision
Updated Materials:
Here are the materials in Estate of Raymond P. Sauser v. United States (D. S.D.):
18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
An excerpt:
Because James Raymond Sauser’s Renunciation of interest in the Trust Land was untimely filed, the IBIA was correct to not consider it when rendering its decision. In order to be valid, the Renunciation needed to be filed with the ALJ prior to the issuance of his final order. In addition, the ALJ and IBIA reasonably interpreted the Decedent’s will and gave effect to its provisions. This Court finds that neither the ALJ nor the IBIA acted arbitrarily and capriciously as defined in the Administrative Procedure Act.
Here is “County Loses Trust Appeal.“
IBIA order affirming the decision of the Acting Alaska Regional Director here. The Board held that the Acting Alaska Regional Director’s decision was not arbitrary or capricious.
Newtok Village Council suit in federal court to prevent further interference from Newtok Traditional Council previously reported here. No new updates on that case.
The Newtok Village in Alaska needs to be relocated nine miles inland to avoid erosion, but a leadership controversy was preventing the release of $6.5 million from the federal government. The Tribe elected a new council in October 2012 and reaffirmed the election in a membership meeting June 2013, but the old council was still requesting funds and contracts with the BIA. The old council appealed the Regional Director’s decision to the DOI in August 2013. The new IBIA order will now allow the Tribe to move forward with the planning stages of the relocation, but many financial issues that arose under the old council’s mismanagement still need to be settled and at least one old council member has said that he will appeal: “It’s not even close to over yet. We are going to the highest court, even to the top of the White House.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.